ignorance of parents essay

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

Characteristics and Effects of an Uninvolved Parenting Style

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist and international bestselling author. Her books, including "13 Things Mentally Strong People Don't Do," have been translated into more than 40 languages. Her TEDx talk,  "The Secret of Becoming Mentally Strong," is one of the most viewed talks of all time.

• Characteristics

Examples of Uninvolved Parenting

Coping with an uninvolved parenting style.

Uninvolved parenting , sometimes referred to as neglectful parenting, is a style characterized by a lack of responsiveness to a child's needs. Uninvolved parents make few to no demands of their children and they are often indifferent, dismissive, or even completely neglectful .

During the 1960s, psychologist Diana Baumrind described three different  parenting styles  based on her research with preschool-age children: authoritarian , authoritative , and permissive parenting. In later years, researchers added uninvolved parenting.

Characteristics of Uninvolved Parenting

Baumrind characterized her parenting styles in terms of two key dimensions: parental responsiveness and parental demandingness. People with an uninvolved parenting style are low on both of these dimensions.

They do not respond well to the needs of their children and provide little affection, support, or love. They also make very few demands on their children. They rarely set rules and do not offer guidance or expectations for behavior.

Common Patterns of Behavior for Uninvolved Parents

• Act emotionally distant from their children
• Limit interactions with their children because they're too overwhelmed by their own problems
• Provide little or no supervision
• Set few or no expectations or demands for behavior
• Show little warmth, love, and affection towards their children
• Skip school events and parent-teacher conferences

Free-Range vs. Uninvolved Parents

It is important to note that uninvolved parenting is not the same as free-range parenting. Where uninvolved parents have no interest in their children's lives, free-range parents are loving and attentive but give their kids plenty of freedom to experience the natural consequences of their actions.

Busy Parents

It is also important to note that just because a parent is busy with work or other obligations does not mean they are uninvolved. Intent and caring matter. While parents may work a lot of hours, they are not uninvolved if they spend the free time they have with their kids and make sure their children are cared for when they cannot be with them.

What's Your Parenting Style?

This fast and free parenting styles quiz can help you analyze the methods you're using to parent your kids and whether or not it may be a good idea to learn some new parenting behaviors:

Uninvolved parents have little emotional involvement with their kids. While they provide for basic needs like food and shelter, they are, for the most part, uninvolved in their children's lives. The exact degree of involvement may vary considerably.

Examples of the uninvolved parenting style include:

• Ignoring their child when they are upset or crying
• Expecting their children to care for themselves 
• Not respecting a child's interests
• Failing to provide adequate supervision for a child

Some uninvolved parents may be relatively hands-off with their kids, but may still have some basic limits such as curfews. Others may be downright neglectful or even reject their children outright. Kids might be given the bare minimum they need for survival, such as shelter, nourishment, and clothing, yet little or nothing in the way of guidance or affection.

Causes of Uninvolved Parenting

It is important to note that uninvolved parenting is often not intentional. It may arise for a number of different reasons, including things like parental experience and stress.

Parents who exhibit an uninvolved parenting style were often raised by uninvolved and dismissive parents. As adults, they may find themselves repeating the same patterns they were raised with. Other parents who display this style may simply be so caught up in their busy lives that they find it easier to take a hands-off approach to dealing with their children.

In some cases, parents may be so wrapped up in their own problems (i.e., being overworked, coping with depression, struggling with substance abuse) that they actually fail to see how uninvolved they are with their children or are simply unable to provide the emotional support their children need.

Effects of Uninvolved Parenting

Researchers associate parenting styles with a range of child outcomes in areas such as social skills and academic performance. The children of uninvolved parents generally perform poorly in nearly every area of life. These children tend to display deficits in cognition, attachment , emotional skills, and social skills.

Due to the lack of emotional responsiveness and love from their caretakers, children raised by uninvolved parents may have difficulty forming attachments later in life.

The complete lack of boundaries in the home makes it difficult to learn appropriate behaviors and limits in school and other social situations, which is why children with uninvolved parents are more likely to misbehave.

What are the effects of uninvolved parents?

Children with uninvolved parents may:

• Be anxious or stressed due to the lack of family support
• Be motionally withdrawn
• Fear becoming dependent on other people
• Have an increased risk of substance abuse
• Have to learn to provide for themselves
• Exhibit more delinquency during adolescence

The uninvolved parenting style can leave a lasting mark on kids, which you may continue to feel as an adult if you were raised by uninvolved parents. You may also fear repeating these patterns with your own children. There are things you can do to improve your parenting skills, such as:

• Learn more about parenting : Read books, websites, and articles devoted to childrearing to learn more about effective approaches that are beneficial for children.
• Take a parenting class : Parent training has been shown to help improve parental involvement. Check with local hospitals, schools, libraries, and community colleges to find parenting courses in your area.
• Consider therapy : Talking to a mental health professional can help you contextualize your own experiences and develop new skills that will help you build healthy bonds and boundaries with your kids.
• Get involved : Make an active effort to spend more time with your children. Listen to them and learn about their lives. Changing isn't easy and it may be more difficult if you are a busy, working parent. Focus on carving out whatever time you can to devote your undivided attention to your kids. 

If you recognize that you have been an uninvolved parent, you may find family therapy helpful. A therapist can help you identify strategies that will help form closer connections, deeper bonds, and better responsiveness within your family unit.

While you can't change the past, there are also things you can do to help heal from being raised by uninvolved parents. Reparenting yourself , developing healthy attachments with other people in your life, and speaking to a mental health professional are all steps you can take that can foster the healing process.

Get Advice From The Verywell Mind Podcast

Hosted by therapist Amy Morin, LCSW, this episode of The Verywell Mind Podcast shares what mentally strong parents do.

Follow Now : Apple Podcasts / Spotify / Google Podcasts

A Word From Verywell

It is clear from looking at the consequences of this type of child-rearing that the uninvolved parenting style is far from ideal. In order to raise confident children who are emotionally healthy and resilient, children need support, warmth, love, appropriate discipline, structure, and guidance from adults that they trust.

Baumrind D. Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior . Genet Psychol Monogr . 1967;75(1):43-88.

Zahed Zahedani Z, Rezaee R, Yazdani Z, Bagheri S, Nabeiei P. The influence of parenting style on academic achievement and career path .  J Adv Med Educ Prof . 2016;4(3):130-134.

Hong YR, Park JS. Impact of attachment, temperament and parenting on human development .  Korean J Pediatr . 2012;55(12):449-454. doi:10.3345/kjp.2012.55.12.449

Hoffmann JP, Bahr SJ. Parenting style, religiosity, peer alcohol use, and adolescent heavy drinking . J Stud Alcohol Drugs . 2014;75(2):222-7. doi:10.15288/jsad.2014.75.222

Hoskins D. Consequences of parenting on adolescent outcomes . Societies . 2014;4(3):506-531. doi:10.3390/soc4030506

Rincón P, Cova F, Saldivia S, et al. Effectiveness of a positive parental practices training program for Chilean preschoolers' families: a randomized controlled trial .  Front Psychol . 2018;9:1751. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01751

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Get in the Crystal

Against “bernie would have won”, never reelect a revolutionary, seeing things as they are, the classics, love in the age of the pickup artist, death is not the end, most popular, against advice, it’s all over, wanting bad things, on being an arsehole, acceptance parenting.

This is part of a series of columns on public philosophy by Agnes Callard; read  more here.

Before the 1970s, the word “parent” was commonly used only as a noun; since that time, American parents have roughly doubled the amount of time they spend parenting, and each generation since seems to stress more about parenting than the previous one. The fact that modern parents are beleaguered by the emotional toil of parenting is now as familiar a trope as the opinion piece advising parents to relax, be less perfectionist and be more forgiving of ourselves.

Economist Bryan Caplan supplements this advice with some science to ease the parental burden. Twin studies, he points out, suggest that genes are significantly more influential than parenting with respect to a wide variety of factors: future income, personality traits, educational attainment, religiosity and marital status. This knowledge, Caplan hopes, ought to give parents permission to take shortcuts: given how minimally you can influence your children, you might as well buy more childcare, ease up on those extracurriculars, let them watch TV and take vacations without them. Let your children roam free outside! They are safer than they have ever been. Don’t let them walk all over you, use discipline to set boundaries—it’s ultimately harmless—and make your own life easier!

Why have parents turned parenting into self-torture? Caplan posits a peer pressure-based desire to keep up with the Joneses, and hopes to wrench people out of this collective mistake by showing them how easy parenting could be, if they just let it: “Intellectual error explains much of the decline in family size.”

“Just relax” is the gentlest species of parenting commentary; harsher critics scornfully characterize modern parents as “helicopters” for micromanaging our children’s lives, and blame our “coddling”—excessive care, indulgence and overprotectiveness—for turning our children into “snowflakes.” The overall implication is that if only parents could muster up the wisdom and courage to defect from this “bad parenting culture,” we could be happily and healthily enjoying our children instead of hovering anxiously and fruitlessly around them.

These critics of modern parenting—gentle and harsh alike—put me in mind of a person who, upon first seeing a car, demands to know where the horses are, and upon being assured there are no horses around, offers advice about where to find some and where to attach them. They simply don’t seem to understand just how fundamentally and irreversibly the parenting game has changed. The easily observable changes, from the heightened attentiveness to the increased stress levels, are but the visible signs of a deep, tectonic shift in our conception of the basic tenets of the enterprise. Traditional parents weren’t better at what today’s parents are doing; traditional parents were tasked with doing something different—and easier.

If one wants to grasp the profundity of the shift, one is better off turning away from those who aim to intervene in parenting culture and toward those who concern themselves with a far more challenging task: accurately representing it. There is a wonderful scene in the British miniseries Years and Years in which a daughter nervously comes out as “trans” to parents who, having snooped on her Google searches, react with a prepared effusion of support: “Oh honey, it’s alright, I swear. We’re completely fine either way! Now look at us, we’re fine! I know we might be a bit slow and a bit old and this is going to be confusing for us and we’ll make a mess of it sometimes, but we love you. We absolutely love you. And we always will. … And if it turns out we’ve got a lovely son instead of a lovely daughter, then we’ll be happy.”

She is momentarily confused, and corrects them: “No. I’m not transsexual, I’m trans human !” She explains that she aspires to first modify her body in various ways to integrate herself into the internet, and eventually to dispense with her body altogether by uploading herself into the cloud: “I don’t want to be flesh.”

The parents react with the shock, outrage and screaming rejection that follows the classic “bad parent” script heard by countless children who have, over the years, presented themselves as diverging from their parents’ expectations with respect to religion, marriage, career, etc. Parents have always been faced with the challenge of handling rebellious, wayward, disobedient children; but at no prior time have they—have we—been so pre-committed to acceptance. At no point in the past was the parental inability to accept that which strikes them as antithetical to their basic understanding of what is true and what is good perceived as a potential failure by the parents’ own  standards.

The consequences of the shift extend well beyond increased parental stress levels. When it comes to the question of whose job it is to conform to whom, the sign has gotten reversed. As a teenager coming of age in the 1990s, I watched the tide turn on homosexuality. From my vantage point, a lot of the change seemed to be driven by acceptance parenting: those who couldn’t stomach rejecting their children rejected their own homophobia instead. As acceptance parenting takes hold culturally, we find ourselves speaking more and more about what it takes to be a “good parent” and less and less frequently of the virtues of a “good son/daughter.” The more we expect the parents’ acceptance, the less concerned we are with children’s obedience.

This in turn helps explain why parenting has objectively become harder. If you want to understand why parents are so much more stressed than they used to be, just consider the slip between “transsexual” and “transhuman”: you cannot predict what, at the end of the day, you will be asked to accept; and you know that from day one; and that knowledge—of your own ignorance—casts a shadow over every parenting decision you make.

I was struck by a recent New York Times piece offering scientifically grounded instruction in praising one’s child. It warns against excessive praise: don’t fuel “‘praise addiction,’ in which a child compulsively performs behaviors to earn approval.” It offers advice on how to target one’s praise: “praise the process, not the person,” as “praising the outcome or the person encourages the child to focus on those things. She might feel performance anxiety. He might question the conditionality of your love.” Also, be sincere: “children can sense when praise is not genuine.” One might wonder who needs to read this: Why can’t parents be trusted to simply praise what they think is praiseworthy and blame what is blameworthy? The answer is that praise and blame are ways of directing children, telling them which direction to go in and what outcomes to avoid. Acceptance parents know that they don’t know the answer to those questions. The inclination to look to scientists for guidance in everything from baby sleep to teenager management suggests a self-awareness, on the part of parents, of our ignorance.

Parents have always justified themselves with reference to the future—you’ll thank me later!—and parents have always aimed at the happiness of their child. What’s radically new is not, at heart, how concerned or permissive we’ve become, but how fully we have given over to our children the job of defining “happiness.” For acceptance parents, neither instinct nor culture is a sufficient guide to what counts as acceptable behavior in a child. Instead of being able to draw on culture and tradition to set standards relative to which children are to be assessed, those standards now come from the people they are to be applied to—more specifically, from future, which is to say, not yet existent, versions of those people.

Traditional parents were in the business of handing to their children a settled way of life: values, habits, standards, practices, skills, sometimes a job. On this older picture, it was the role of the parent to give—“tradition” comes from tradere , “to hand over”—and the child to accept, obediently. If I were a traditional parent, I would be trying to give my child some version of my life; as an acceptance parent, I am trying to give my child something I don’t have and am not familiar with— his life.

And yet parental resources are no greater than they have ever been. Apart from some desperate attempts at supplementation—all those after-school activities parents are mocked for enrolling children in—all that each of us has to give remains her own values and standards and practices and skills. The only thing we can change is how we “give” them, and so we’ve come to make our offerings with circumspection and delicacy. We hover around our children attentively, experimenting with what will or won’t “take.” Even though we acceptance parents are committed to tolerance, our resources are no less constrained than those of traditional parents: we are able to tolerate what we independently find tolerable. The difference is that now, when our children transgress our boundaries, we no longer feel sure whose side we should be on. Like all forms of freedom, acceptance parenting makes life more, and not less, stressful. If the parent is demoted from wise authority figure to tentative spokesperson for the child’s future self, childhood and child-rearing become a nerve-wracking quest to find one’s own footing.

Once you flip the switch from tradition to acceptance, it doesn’t flip back. And that’s why acceptance parenting is not so much a style of parenting as the backdrop against which parenting battles are fought.

Consider the case of Amy Chua, the self-proclaimed “tiger mother” whose entertaining book records the intense time and effort she expends on her young daughters’ musical training. Chua claims to be engaged in “traditional Chinese parenting,” but the details of her book tell a different story. She fights with her daughters constantly, and tolerates a level of insolence (“‘She’s insane,’ I’d hear them whispering to each other, giggling”) that does not accord with the respectful obedience required by “traditional Chinese parenting,” as Chua herself characterizes it.

“I will not give up on you,” Chua tells her rebellious younger daughter. And Chua reports: “‘I want you to give up on me!’ Lulu yelled back more than once.” When push comes to shove, Lulu “wins” the battle over switching from violin to tennis. Chua views this concession as a break in her parenting philosophy—she laments her own weakness in capitulating to “Western parenting”—but in fact it is consistent with the justifications she has been giving, to herself and her daughters, all along.

Chua’s musical training program was not aimed at turning her daughters into musicians; rather, music was a vehicle for “arming them with skills, work habits, and inner confidence that no one can ever take away.” When tennis turns out to be a better vehicle, Chua readily adapts, “texting her [tennis coach] with questions and practice strategies… Sometimes, when Lulu’s least expecting it—at breakfast or when I’m saying good night—I’ll suddenly yell out, ‘More rotation on the swing volley!’ or ‘Don’t move your right foot on your kick serve!’”

Pre- and post-tennis, Chua’s message is consistent. She tells her daughters, “My goal as a parent is to prepare you for the future—not to make you like me.” The fact that preparing them for the future and making them like you are contrasted rather than identified is one hallmark of acceptance parenting. Another is the tendency to privilege confidence over obedience. When you don’t know someone well enough to buy them a gift, you give them money; likewise, self-confidence and diligence are seen as the universal tool for the child who must “become someone”—you know not who.

The failure to acknowledge the revolutionary turn to acceptance parenting leads Chua to exaggerate the degree to which she diverges from “Western parents.” And it leads many of the critics of parenting culture to misunderstand their audience. Traditional parents, ones engaged in “molding” children into the image of themselves, are the people who would have been reassured by Caplan’s argument that most of the molding work has already been done by genetics. But for acceptance parents, there is no shape into which they are trying to mold their children at all. The fact that my child’s DNA heavily influences many aspects of his future offers me little guidance as to what I mean—or rather, what he will mean — by “happy.”

What makes parenting in a pandemic so difficult is not, first and foremost, the increased time commitment. It is not even the close-up view of your children’s suffering—watching them become withdrawn, struggle to cheer themselves up, lose weight. The hardest part is the work of parenting itself, which is to say, the parts of one’s engagement with one’s child that concern their future. My youngest child boycotted zoomschool in the spring; he’s very social, but when we tried to appeal to his desire to see his friends, his response was irrefutable: “Those are not my friends! My friends are not flat!” My husband started teaching him Euclid, mostly so as to give us the feeling that he is learning… something.

My middle son is more willing to play along, and it is one of the bright spots of zoomlife that I can snoop on his school day and learn that I have raised a Class Participator. But I can also hear the relief in his voice when he announces a fifteen-minute break between Zooms, and I see that he spends much of his day in a frustrated hunt for what folder another folder is supposed to go in. He’s being occupied, but not necessarily educated.

My oldest watches multiple movies a day—they speak to him more than anything his teachers say over their screens—and when he’s not watching movies, he’s writing them: hundreds, probably thousands, of pages of scripts. Would a “good parent” be pushing him to be more invested in school? Spend more time outdoors? Reading? Something else? Would a good parent curtail his screen time, or would she encourage him to stay the course? Should I be blaming or praising him? Scientists who study praise don’t have the answers for me.

And I don’t think they could give any, even if they tried, unless they could answer questions like: Will movies even exist after this pandemic? What kind of a world am I sending him into? Which of his talents will be of most use—to himself and others—in it? How do I help him develop them?

The problem here is not my fear of employing discipline, or my inclination to micromanage. The problem is ignorance. Unlike my forebears, I don’t know the things I need to know in order to be a good parent, and none of the people telling me to calm down know those things either. The only one who might know, my grown child, doesn’t yet exist.

If you liked this essay, you’ll love reading The Point in print.

Subscribe Today

The Sex Dimension

The 2023 film How to Have Sex follows three sixteen-year-old girls on their first holiday abroad together, intent on a bender of drink, dancing, poolside…

Schooling Myself

I was four and a half, and had recently informed my mother that I needed to learn to read by my fifth birthday.

The Velvet Ditch

“Happy hour at the City Grocery in Oxford, Mississippi is where the whole hip world would spend Thursday night if the Nazis won the war,”…