argumentative essay corporal punishment should not be a disciplinary measure

• Essay Samples
• College Essay
• Writing Tools
• Writing guide

Creative samples from the experts

↑ Return to Essay Samples

Argumentative Essay: Should Corporal Punishment Have a Place in Education?

Corporal punishment is the act of using physical force to punish a student for wrongdoing. It might involve a ruler across the back of the hand or a cane to the rear. Corporal punishment has since been outlawed as a cruel and unusual punishment. In this essay, I explore the for and against of implementing corporal punishment within education.

One reason to bring back corporal punishment is to give power back to teachers again. Teaching staff often struggle to chastise students because current punishments have no intimidation power. If they have no power to intimidate students, there’s nothing to fear and no deterrent. A lack of corporal punishment leaves teachers powerless to prevent bad behavior.

On the other hand, corporal punishment often causes injuries and trauma unnecessarily. Many acts of corporal punishment leave visible marks and bruises. The mental anguish, particularly for vulnerable students, can last a lifetime. This doesn’t have the effect of dealing with bad behavior. It can lead directly to lifelong mental problems.

There are also studies showing corporal punishment has no effect on bad behavior. They demonstrate the behavior altering effects is actually trauma coming to the surface. This can cause chronic low confidence and low self-esteem.

Corporal punishment is a viable alternative to suspension. Children often don’t enjoy school. A suspension from school can send out the message it’s a reward rather than a punishment. Using corporal punishment keeps students in school and punishes them, therefore making it clear it isn’t a reward.

There’s always the risk of it leading to abuse in the classroom, however. Teachers do differ in how hard they hit a student. There’s a difference between a 100-pound female teacher and a 250-pound male teacher delivering corporal punishment. This leads to an uneven system whereby the severity of the punishment largely revolves around luck. It’s unfair on students and only makes abuse by teachers more likely.

When a student is punished severely, parents often have to leave work to collect them and take them home again. It disrupts the school schedule and the parent’s schedule. Constant call-outs could lead to a parent losing their job for being unreliable. It can cause a great deal of damage to a family. Corporal punishment stops this from happening because it places the trust in the hands of the teachers.

Putting trust in teachers isn’t something everyone is willing to do, however. Sexual abuse is a major topic in schools and parents are rightly worried about the chances of this abuse manifesting itself. Abuse comes in many different forms. A male teacher could touch a female student on the breast and claim he was meant to touch her on the shoulder. All corporal punishment does is increase the likelihood of sexual abuse occurring.

These are the main arguments for and against corporal punishment. They discuss the practical aspects and the potential flaws of the system. I believe corporal punishment is a flawed system and there are superior alternatives to discipline, such as expulsion and community service. They offer up a punishment without the abuse.

Follow Us on Social Media

Get more free essays

Send via email

Most useful resources for students:.

• Free Essays Download
• Writing Tools List
• Proofreading Services
• Universities Rating

Contributors Bio

Find more useful services for students

Free plagiarism check, professional editing, online tutoring, free grammar check.

The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment Essay (Critical Writing)

Corporal punishment as a form of disciplinary action to children has elicited a fierce debate and controversy over its effectiveness in shaping children’s behavior in the society. Sociologists, psychologists, and legal experts differ on whether corporal punishment has long-term benefits in shaping children’s behavior or not. The difference in opinions has resulted into quest for more research in order to ascertain both short and long-term effects of corporal punishment on children.

Gershoff argues that, “crucial questions remain unanswered, such as what range of child behaviors and experiences are empirically associated with parental corporal punishment, as well as why, how, and for whom corporal punishment might have such effects” (539). Due to lack of empirical evidences to prove whether corporal punishment is harmful or not to the children, the opposing schools of thought are yet to justify their theoretical views and beliefs.

The research concerning corporal punishment is very complex because there are no clear-cut differences between abusive punishment and non-abusive punishment, thus confounding the research findings. Furthermore, corporal punishment and naughty behaviors have intricate relationship in that, it is very difficult to establish causal relationships. Since corporal punishment is associated with untoward childhood behaviors and experiences, it is an ineffective and an undesirable form of parental discipline.

Corporal punishment is ineffective and undesirable form of parental discipline because it only causes immediate compliance, which has short-term effects in shaping child’s behavior contrary to the long-term expectations by the parents. Numerous studies have shown that parents normally administer corporal punishment with the objective of realizing immediate compliance of the children. Empirical studies have proved that short-term compliance due to corporal punishment is very effective in learning.

“There is general consensus that corporal punishment is effective in getting children to comply immediately, but at the same time there is caution from child abuse researchers that corporal punishment by its nature can escalate into physical maltreatment” (Gershoff 549).

Meta-analysis has proved that administration of corporal punishment does not have long-term behavioral change as expected by the parents; it only causes immediate compliance, and this phenomenon beats the logic of using corporal punishment in disciplining children.

Corporal punishment is essential in achieving control of rowdy and disruptive children; nevertheless, it does not help in long-term development of behavior in children. Although corporal punishment has short-term compliance, continued and consistent administration negatively affects internalization of morals.

Continued and consistent administration of corporal punishment affects children negatively in the process internalizing the desired morals. Moral internalization is appropriate mechanism of developing acceptable behaviors because intrinsic factors rather than the extrinsic factors form the essential driving forces that compel children to mature well. Social and emotional maturation of the children critically depends on the intrinsic factors for such factors enable children to internalize moral values and beliefs in the society.

In contrast, extrinsic factors such as corporal punishment seem to have an imposing influence on the intrinsic factors thus affecting internalization of morals. The intrinsic and extrinsic factors that regulate behavior development during the growth of children have mutually exclusive effect in the development of behaviors.

According to the attribution theory, “theorists emphasize that power-assertive methods such as corporal punishment promote children’s external attributions for their behavior and minimize their attributions to internal motivations corporal punishment … may not facilitate moral internalization because it does not teach children reasons for behaving correctly” (Gershoff 541).

Therefore, corporal punishment does not instill the essence of morality to the children for children subjected to corporal punishment behave according to conditioned punishment. Since the children do not understand the essence of morality, they develop aggressive behaviors to resist or avoid severe corporal punishment.

Administration of corporal punishment results into aggressive behavior; hence it is ineffective and undesirable form of parental discipline. The relationship between corporal punishment and aggressive behavior is very complex to establish causal relationship.

Extensive literature reviews have confirmed that, there is significant positive correlation between corporal punishment and aggressive behaviors among children. These findings imply that corporal punishment promotes development of aggressive behaviors in children, thus inappropriate form of parental discipline.

Based on the attribution theory, the relationship between corporal punishment and aggressive behavior emanate from the fact that corporal punishment interferes with the internalization of moral values and beliefs, leaving children to depend on extrinsic factors as determinants of morality resulting into aggressive defense.

Social control theory also indicates that corporal punishment degrades child-parent relationship, prevent internalization of moral values, and increases aggressive behaviors due to lack of internal motivation and self-control.

Gershoff argues that, “parental corporal punishment affects children primarily by initiating and shaping emotional and cognitive processes in the children, which in turn predispose them to engage in certain behaviors or have particular experiences such as aggression” (551). Hence, cognitive processes are important in mediating and developing aggressive behaviors and experiences. However, it is very difficult to establish causal relationship between corporal punishment and development of naughty behaviors.

Despite the assumption that untoward behavior and experiences relates with corporal punishment, the causal relation between corporal punishment and development of naughty behaviors is blurred which makes it difficult to determine the causational effect. Psychological research depends on observational and experiential models to establish causal relationships but the findings do not consider confounding factors that could possibly mediate assumed causal relationship between corporal punishment and development of naughty behaviors.

Gershoff asserts that although models of correlation have assumed that corporal punishment causes naughty behaviors, they have not sufficiently ruled out the possibility that naughty behaviors to induce corporal punishment, “because corporal punishment occurs rarely and eludes observation, researchers interested in the effects of corporal punishment need to consider more ingenious methods of establishing causality” (556).

Therefore, there is no sufficient evidence to prove that causation relationship exists between corporal punishment and development of naughty behaviors. However, meta-analysis research has attempted to demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that corporal punishment causes naughty behaviors in children.

The establishment of causation relationship is quite possible because meta-analysis research measures and monitors behavior development from the earliest point possible thus considering time precedence and isolating other factors that may confound the causational effect. Since there is no significance evidence to rule out that corporal punishment increases development of naughty behaviors, then corporal punishment is ineffective and undesirable form of parental discipline.

In a recap, the controversy regarding the effectiveness of corporal punishment still rages as the opposing schools of thoughts have strong evidence to support their views. Sociologists, psychologists and legal experts have not yet reached a conclusion that corporal punishment elicits untoward behaviors and experiences in children. Given that the relationship between corporal punishment and naughty behavior in children is very complex, it is also difficult to establish the causational relationship without making some assumptions.

Nevertheless, meta-analysis has significantly demonstrated that there is causational relationship between corporal punishment and development of naughty behaviors. The relationship between corporal punishment and naughty behaviors portrays chicken-egg relationship in that, it is difficult to establish which one of two comes first.

Works Cited

Gershoff, Elizabeth. “Corporal Punishment by Parents and Associated Child Behaviors and Experiences: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 128.4 (2002): 539–579.

• The Economic Significance of Capital Punishment
• Miranda v. Arizona (Self-incrimination)
• Child’s Corporal Punishment: Christian vs. Secular Discipline
• Social Issues: Corporal Punishment
• Familial Violence and Corporal Punishment Approval
• Women in Prison: Issues and Challenges Faced by Female Inmates
• Public Forms of Punishment
• Hate Crimes Causes and Penalties
• The Death Penalty: Can It Ever Be Justified?
• Criminal Justice Department
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, September 17). The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporal-punishment/

"The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment." IvyPanda , 17 Sept. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/corporal-punishment/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment'. 17 September.

IvyPanda . 2018. "The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment." September 17, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporal-punishment/.

1. IvyPanda . "The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment." September 17, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporal-punishment/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The Debate on the Effectiveness of Corporal Punishment." September 17, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporal-punishment/.

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

• Basic site functions
• Ensuring secure, safe transactions
• Secure account login
• Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
• Remembering privacy and security settings
• Analyzing site traffic and usage
• Personalized search, content, and recommendations
• Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

• Remembering general and regional preferences
• Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Corporal Punishment — The Controversy of Corporal Punishment in Schools

The Controversy of Corporal Punishment in Schools

• Categories: Corporal Punishment

About this sample

Words: 568 |

Published: Feb 12, 2024

Words: 568 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Table of contents

Introduction, exploring alternatives to corporal punishment, understanding the adverse impact of physical abuse, examining corporal punishment in public schools, looking towards a solution, works cited.

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 540 words

2 pages / 684 words

1 pages / 1084 words

1 pages / 559 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Corporal Punishment

Should the death penalty be abolished? Essay on this question can be quite controversial, no matter what side of the argument is chosen. But it is important to understand the reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. [...]

The topic of corporal punishment in schools has sparked intense debate among educators, parents, and policymakers for decades. This practice, which involves the physical disciplining of students, often through methods such as [...]

As children grow, they are prone to some mistakes and bad behavior. These undesirable reactions result from the exposure to the new environments and their little knowledge what good behavior entails. It is the responsibility of [...]

The prevalence of violence within educational institutions, directed either towards educators or students, constitutes a significant and escalating issue in our society. Inadequate disciplinary measures often bear responsibility [...]

Physician-assisted suicide is a topic that has been at the forefront of bioethics for many years now and yet no real consensus has been made on whether it should be a right afforded to all patients. Cases can be made for either [...]

Relief from pain, and preservation of health and or life is the basic role of medicine and all the technologies associated with it. However, in some instances where the disease is a terminal one with no known cure, pain is the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Irja Ankonga

How to write an argumentative essay for corporal punishment.

Similar Questions

Reason for choosing an article from an edited book to write an academic essay:, four features of good academic writing essay: 1. clear thesis statement. 2. proper organization and structure. 3. use of evidence to support arguments. 4. correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation., write at least 5-paragraph essay about "the culture of afar community ", how do you structure your discussion when writing an essay, essay on mausam barsaat ke maje in easy words in urdu word limit 200 words, write an essay describing macro level of social work intervention, providing examples, essay summarize, what is the primary purpose of a thesis statement in an essay a. to provide background information b. to summarize the main points to present a clear argument or viewpoint c., what is the purpose of the conclusion in an essay a. to introduce new arguments b. to provide background information to summarize the main points and restate the thesis, write an essay in six points about effects of corruption in socioeconomic development in our society, please log in to continue., be one of the experts, frequently asked questions, terms of use, privacy policy, select language.

The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: a Critical Analysis of its Efficacy

This essay about the efficacy of corporal punishment engages in a meticulous examination of its impact, immersing itself in the ongoing discourse surrounding child discipline. Advocates argue for its indispensable role in swiftly deterring undesirable behavior, but mounting skepticism arises as research challenges assumed effectiveness and raises concerns about potential harm. The essay unravels the intricate narrative, delving into the psychological repercussions and long-term effects on children. Cultural nuances further complicate the debate, with diverse attitudes shaping perspectives on corporal punishment. Critics argue that its use perpetuates a cycle of violence, normalizing physical aggression as a conflict resolution method. The essay concludes by advocating for a paradigm shift towards alternative disciplinary approaches that prioritize positive reinforcement, open communication, and emotional intelligence for the holistic growth of the younger generation in evolving societies.

How it works

In the ever-evolving dialogue surrounding child discipline, the persistent controversy regarding corporal punishment takes center stage, beckoning a thorough and nuanced exploration. This essay embarks on a meticulous critical analysis of the efficacy of corporal punishment, immersing itself in the ongoing discourse that continues to enthrall educational and parenting spheres. As societal perspectives on discipline undergo continual transformation, a detailed examination of the impact and consequences of corporal punishment emerges as not only pertinent but imperative.

Corporal punishment, characterized by the deliberate use of physical force to induce pain without causing injury, weaves through the historical fabric of disciplinary practices.

Advocates uphold it as an indispensable means of swiftly deterring undesirable behavior. However, this stance encounters mounting skepticism as an expanding body of research challenges assumed effectiveness and raises apprehensions about potential harm associated with such punitive measures.

At the core of the controversy lies a fundamental query: does corporal punishment genuinely prove effective in instilling discipline? While proponents assert its prompt curbing of misbehavior, a critical analysis unravels a more intricate narrative. Studies suggest that while corporal punishment may yield immediate compliance, it often falls short of addressing the root causes of misbehavior. The use of fear as a motivator may hinder a child’s moral reasoning and understanding of consequences, potentially leading to recurring behavioral issues.

Beyond the immediate concerns, the psychological repercussions of corporal punishment emerge as a profound area of concern. A consistent body of research points to a correlation between physical discipline and adverse emotional outcomes for children. The fear and anxiety induced by corporal punishment not only corrode the child’s trust in authority figures but may also contribute to the development of aggressive tendencies, prompting profound questions about the enduring effects on mental health and overall well-being.

Navigating the debate becomes more intricate when considering diverse cultural and societal influences. Attitudes and practices related to corporal punishment exhibit wide-ranging variations across different regions and communities. While some perceive it as a traditional and effective form of discipline, others challenge its ethical underpinnings and question its role in fostering a positive parent-child or teacher-student relationship. Recognizing these cultural nuances is imperative in comprehending the myriad perspectives that shape the multifaceted controversy surrounding corporal punishment.

Critics argue that utilizing physical force as a disciplinary tool perpetuates a worrisome cycle of violence. Children exposed to corporal punishment may internalize the belief that physical aggression is an acceptable means of conflict resolution. This learned behavior can subsequently manifest in their own interactions, contributing to a broader societal normalization of violence as a method of control.

A comprehensive critical analysis of corporal punishment mandates an exploration of alternative disciplinary approaches. The paradigm shift towards positive reinforcement, open communication, and the cultivation of emotional intelligence emerges as a compelling alternative. Strategies such as time-outs, loss of privileges, and dialogue-based interventions are posited as more effective means of addressing behavioral issues while concurrently nurturing a psychologically and emotionally healthier environment.

In conclusion, the enduring controversy surrounding corporal punishment necessitates an incisive examination of its efficacy as a disciplinary method. The argument for immediate compliance and deterrence must be scrutinized against the potential enduring consequences on a child’s psychological well-being and moral development. As societies undergo transformation, the imperative lies in fostering open, inclusive discussions, embracing cultural diversity, and exploring alternative approaches that prioritize positive reinforcement, thereby ensuring the holistic growth of the younger generation.

Cite this page

The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy. (2024, Mar 12). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/

"The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy." PapersOwl.com , 12 Mar 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/ [Accessed: 26 Oct. 2024]

"The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy." PapersOwl.com, Mar 12, 2024. Accessed October 26, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/

"The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy," PapersOwl.com , 12-Mar-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/. [Accessed: 26-Oct-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/ [Accessed: 26-Oct-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers