Deductive logic
Society can and should be studied empirically and scientifically. | Interpretivism | Research on humans | People interpret their social roles in relationship, which influences how they then give meaning to those roles and the roles of others. |
Social constructionism | Truth as varying, socially constructed, and ever-changing | Reality is created collectively; social context and interaction frame our realities |
Critical paradigm | Power, inequality, and social change | Social science can never be truly value-free and should be conducted with the express goal of social change in mind. |
Postmodernism | | Truth in any form may or may not be knowable |
Research Methods, Data Collection and Ethics Copyright © 2020 by Valerie Sheppard is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies
- December 2013
- International Journal of Management Reviews 16(4)
- University of Texas at Dallas
Discover the world's research
- 25+ million members
- 160+ million publication pages
- 2.3+ billion citations
No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.
- Paulo Alexandre Costa Araújo Sampaio
- Juan Camilo Álvarez-Arciniegas
- María Fernanda Garnica-Rugeles
- Tiago Martins Ramos da Silva
- Majbritt Greve
- Michael Wendelboe Hansen
- Seong-Yoon Shin
- Kwang-Seong Shin
- Florian Bürki
- Alexandre Santos
- Miriam Bender
- Marjory Williams
- Nguyen The Anh
- Dao Thi Huong
- Stephan Manning
- Tahir Islam
- Ahmed Zaheer
- Paulo Augusto Cauchick-Miguel
- Thayla Tavares de Sousa Zomer
- Alexandra David
- Theresa Rosenberger
- PSYCHOL MARKET
- Soo Il Shin
- Joan B. Mwanza
- Evaristo Nsenduluka
- Overson Shumba
- ASIA PAC J EDUC
- Amanda da Silva Camargo
- Igor Simões Ferreira Da Silva
- Markus Tümpel
- Melanie Hühn
- Marie Louise (M.L.) Blankesteijn
- Jorick Houtkamp
- Lynne Gabriel
- Int J Innovat Tech Manag
- Elizabeth Hearn
- J CLEAN PROD
- CRIME LAW SOCIAL CH
- Jana Macfarlane Horn
- Douglas G. Mook
- J OPER MANAG
- Scott Douglas Sagan
- Geert Hofstede
- Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
- L. J. III Bourgeois
- Harvey M. Sapolsky
- Scott D. Sagan
- Karl Popper
- Y.S. Lincoln
- M. Hammersley
- D.T. Campbell
- J.C. Stanley
- D. Harrison
- John Gerring
- J PUBL ADM RES THEOR
- T.R. La Porte
- Benjamin L. Hallen
- SOCIOL THEOR
- Michael Burawoy
- Oliver E. Williamson
- R. A. Sharpe
- H. J. Eysenck
- D. P. O'Brien
- O. E. Williamson
- Oliver Williamson
- L. L. Cummings
- Rev Mexic Soc
- Stanley Lieberson
- Barry A. Turner
- Alan Bryman
- Larry A. Platt
- Anne Salter
- H. W. Smith
- Am Cathol Socio Rev
- Irving M. Copi
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
Our websites may use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, you agree to this collection. For more information, please see our University Websites Privacy Notice .
Neag School of Education
Educational Research Basics by Del Siegle
Qualitative research paradigm.
I am amazed how often we hear qualitative researchers applying their standards to quantitative research or quantitative researchers applying their standards to qualitative research. Each functions within different assumptions. Finding fault with one approach with the standards of another does little to promote understanding. Each approach should be judges on its theoretical basis.
The Assumptions of Qualitative Designs
- Qualitative researchers are concerned primarily with process , rather than outcomes or products.
- Qualitative researchers are interested in meaning: how people make sense of their lives, experiences, and their structures of the world.
- The qualitative researcher is the primary instrument for data collection and analysis. Data are mediated through this human instrument, rather than through inventories, questionnaires, or machines.
- Qualitative research involves fieldwork . The researcher physically goes to the people, setting, site, or institution to observe or record behavior in its natural setting.
- Qualitative research is descriptive in that the researcher is interested in process, meaning, and understanding gained through words or pictures.
- The process of qualitative research is inductive in that the researcher builds abstractions, concepts, hypotheses, and theories from details.
…..Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
….. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Arguments Supporting Qualitative Inquiry
- Human behavior is significantly influenced by the setting in which it occurs; thus one must study that behavior in situations. The physical setting (e.g., schedules, space, pay, and rewards) and the internalized notions of norms, traditions, roles, and values are crucial contextual variables. Research must be conducted in the setting where all the contextual variables are operating.
- Past researchers have not been able to derive meaning…from experimental research.
- The research techniques themselves, in experimental research, [can]…affect the findings. The lab, the questionnaire, and so on, [can]…become artifacts. Subjects [can become]…either suspicious and wary, or they [can become]…aware of what the researchers want and try to please them. Additionally, subjects sometimes do not know their feelings, interactions, and behaviors, so they cannot articulate them to respond to a questionnaire.
- One cannot understand human behavior without understanding the framework within which subjects interpret their thoughts, feelings, and actions. Researchers need to understand the framework. In fact, the “objective ” scientist, by coding and standardizing, may destroy valuable data while imposing her world on the subjects.
- Field study research can explore the processes and meanings of events.
…..Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1980). Designing qualitative research . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Predispositions of Quantitative and Qualitative Modes of Inquiry
Although some social science researchers (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Schwandt, 1989) perceive qualitative and quantitative approaches as incompatible, others (Patton, 1990; Reichardt & Cook, 1979) believe that the skilled researcher can successfully combine approaches. The argument usually becomes muddled because one party argues from the underlying philosophical nature of each paradigm, and the other focuses on the apparent compatibility of the research methods, enjoying the rewards of both numbers and words. Because the positivist and the interpretivist paradigms rest on different assumptions about the nature of the world, they require different instruments and procedures to find the type of data desired. This does not mean, however, that the positivist never uses interviews nor that the interpretivist never uses a survey. They may, but such methods are supplementary, not dominant….Different approaches allow us to know and understand different things about the world….Nonetheless, people tend to adhere to the methodology that is most consonant with their socialized worldview. (p. 9)
….. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Contrasting Positivist and Naturalist Axioms (Beliefs and Assumptions)
| | |
| Reality is single, tangible, and fragmentable. | Realities are multiple, constructed, and holistic. |
| Knower and known are independent, a dualism. | Knower and known are interactive, inseparable. |
| Time- and context-free generalizations (nomothetic statements) are possible. | Only time- and context-bound working hypotheses (idiographic statements) are possible. |
| There are real causes, temporally precedent to or simultaneous with their effects. | All entities are in a state of mutual simultaneous shaping, so that it is impossible to distinguish causes from effects. |
| Inquiry is value-free. | Inquiry is value-bound. |
….. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
| |
1. What do I know about a problem that will allow me to formulate and test a hypothesis? | 1. What do my informants know about their culture that I can discover? |
2. What concepts can I use to test this hypothesis? | 2. What concepts do my informants use to classify their experiences? |
3. How can I operationally define these concepts? | 3. How do my informants define these concepts? |
4. What scientific theory can explain the data? | 4. What folk theory do my informants use to explain their experience? |
5. How can I interpret the results and report them in the language of my colleagues? | 5. How can I translate the cultural knowledge of my informants into a cultural description my colleagues will understand? |
….. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Five popular types of Qualitative Research are
- Ethnography
- Phenomenological
- Grounded Theory
Del Siegle, Ph.D [email protected] www.delsiegle.info
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Multiple Choice Quiz. Take the quiz to test your understanding of the key concepts covered in the chapter. Try testing yourself before you read the chapter to see where your strengths and weaknesses are, then test yourself again once you've read the chapter to see how well you've understood. Tip: Click on each link to expand and view the ...
Which research paradigm is least concerned about generalizing its findings? Explanation. Qualitative research is least concerned about generalizing its findings, as it prioritizes in-depth understanding of specific contexts and experiences rather than generalizability. Question.
MeSH terms. Generalization, which is an act of reasoning that involves drawing broad inferences from particular observations, is widely-acknowledged as a quality standard in quantitative research, but is more controversial in qualitative research. The goal of most qualitative studies is not to generalize but ra ….
Researchers using this paradigm are more often than not aiming to create a more just, egalitarian society in which individual and collective freedoms are secure. Both quantitative and qualitative methods can be used with this paradigm. 4. Constructivist Research Paradigm.
The research paradigm is the framework into which the theories and practices of your discipline fit to create the research plan. This foundation guides all areas of your research plan, including the aim of the study, research question, instruments or measurements used, and analysis methods. Most research paradigms are based on one of two model ...
Abstract. Generalizability in qualitative research has been a controversial topic given that interpretivist scholars have resisted the dominant role and mandate of the positivist tradition within social sciences. Aiming to find universal laws, the positivist paradigm has made generalizability a crucial criterion for evaluating the rigor of ...
Understanding research paradigms are crucial as they guide scientific discoveries through. their assumptions and principles (Park, Konge, and Artino, 2020). Fitzgerald and Howcroft. (1998) noted ...
The potential for generalization of research findings is among the most divisive of concerns facing psychologists. An article by Roald, Køppe, Jensen, Hansen, and Levin argues that generalizability is not only a relevant concern but an inescapable dimension of qualitative research, directly challenging the view that generalization and generalizability apply only to quantitative research. Thus ...
Common Examples of Research Paradigms. 1. Positivism. Positivists believe that there's a single reality that's possible to measure and understand. Because of this, they're most likely to use quantitative methods in their research. Typically, positivists propose a hypothesis that can be proved or disproved using statistical data analysis.
The chapter begins by unpacking the concept of research paradigm and its importance, exploring its historical development, and presenting an overview and comparison of major research paradigms. Furthermore, the chapter delves into the philosophical foundations of research paradigms, elucidating the role of epistemology, ontology, axiology, and ...
Which research paradigm is based on the pragmatic view of reality? a. quantitative research b. qualitative research c. mixed research d. none of the above. Which research paradigm is least concerned about generalizing its findings? a. quantitative research b. qualitative research c. mixed research d. none of the above
In this chapter, we outline how individual subject methods, that is, so-called single-case designs, provide straightforward and, in principle, simple methods to assess the reliability and generality of research findings. The chapter consists of three major sections. In the first, we summarize the limitations of traditional methods, especially as they relate to assessing reliability and ...
First, we describe types of generalizability, the use of trustworthiness criteria, and strategies for maximizing generalizability within and across studies, then we discuss how the research approaches of grounded theory, autoethnography, content analysis, and metasynthesis can yield greater generalizability of findings.
concerned with the phenomenon in terms of its nature of existence or the study of reality since researchers need to know what is and what exists to research it (Weber, 2004).
Study with Quizlet and memorise flashcards containing terms like Which research paradigm is most concerned about generalizing its findings?, In an experiment, the group that does not receive the intervention is called?, Which of the following is a weakness of quantitative research? a) Provides precise, numerical data b) The researcher's categories that are used might not reflect local ...
Drawing on the literature, the author shows that case study results may be less generalizable than those of quantitative methods only in the case of within-population generalization. The author argues that case studies have merits over quantitative methods in terms of theoretical generalization, identifying disconfirming cases and providing ...
Positivism. Objectivity, knowability, Deductive logic. Society can and should be studied empirically and scientifically. Interpretivism. Research on humans. People interpret their social roles in relationship, which influences how they then give meaning to those roles and the roles of others. Social constructionism.
Which of the three major research paradigms is most concerned about generalizing its research findings? Quantitative research. The type of variable that is "presumed to cause changes in another variable" is known as which of the following? Independent variable.
Abstract. The case study as a key research method has often been criticized for generating results that are less generalizable than those of large-sample, quantitative methods. This paper clearly ...
Naturalist Paradigm (Qualitative) The nature of reality. Reality is single, tangible, and fragmentable. Realities are multiple, constructed, and holistic. The relationship of knower to the known. Knower and known are independent, a dualism. Knower and known are interactive, inseparable. The possibility of generalization.
D- Can study a large number of people., Quantitative methods Which research paradigm is most concerned about generalizing its findings? A- Quantitative research B- Qualitative research C- Mixed-methods research D- Ethno-methodological research, In an experiment, the group that does not receive the intervention is called: A- The experimental ...
A. Action research. for conducting research, is a reassuring guide for all research plans. It ensures their. that stands out for its unique focus on generalizing findings, is mainly concerned with this aspect. Unlike the other paradigms, it exclusively concentrates on this, ensuring that conclusions may be widely applied to larger contexts.
Which research paradigm is based on the pragmatic view of reality? a. quantitative research b. qualitative research c. mixed research d. none of the above. Which research paradigm is least concerned about generalizing its findings? a. quantitative research b. qualitative research c. mixed research d. none of the above