importance of report writing in research wikipedia

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Report – Example, Writing Guide and Types

Research Report – Example, Writing Guide and Types

Table of Contents

Research Report

Definition:

Research Report is a written document that presents the results of a research project or study, including the research question, methodology, results, and conclusions, in a clear and objective manner.

The purpose of a research report is to communicate the findings of the research to the intended audience, which could be other researchers, stakeholders, or the general public.

Components of Research Report

Components of Research Report are as follows:

Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for the research report and provides a brief overview of the research question or problem being investigated. It should include a clear statement of the purpose of the study and its significance or relevance to the field of research. It may also provide background information or a literature review to help contextualize the research.

Literature Review

The literature review provides a critical analysis and synthesis of the existing research and scholarship relevant to the research question or problem. It should identify the gaps, inconsistencies, and contradictions in the literature and show how the current study addresses these issues. The literature review also establishes the theoretical framework or conceptual model that guides the research.

Methodology

The methodology section describes the research design, methods, and procedures used to collect and analyze data. It should include information on the sample or participants, data collection instruments, data collection procedures, and data analysis techniques. The methodology should be clear and detailed enough to allow other researchers to replicate the study.

The results section presents the findings of the study in a clear and objective manner. It should provide a detailed description of the data and statistics used to answer the research question or test the hypothesis. Tables, graphs, and figures may be included to help visualize the data and illustrate the key findings.

The discussion section interprets the results of the study and explains their significance or relevance to the research question or problem. It should also compare the current findings with those of previous studies and identify the implications for future research or practice. The discussion should be based on the results presented in the previous section and should avoid speculation or unfounded conclusions.

The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the study and restates the main argument or thesis presented in the introduction. It should also provide a brief overview of the contributions of the study to the field of research and the implications for practice or policy.

The references section lists all the sources cited in the research report, following a specific citation style, such as APA or MLA.

The appendices section includes any additional material, such as data tables, figures, or instruments used in the study, that could not be included in the main text due to space limitations.

Types of Research Report

Types of Research Report are as follows:

Thesis is a type of research report. A thesis is a long-form research document that presents the findings and conclusions of an original research study conducted by a student as part of a graduate or postgraduate program. It is typically written by a student pursuing a higher degree, such as a Master’s or Doctoral degree, although it can also be written by researchers or scholars in other fields.

Research Paper

Research paper is a type of research report. A research paper is a document that presents the results of a research study or investigation. Research papers can be written in a variety of fields, including science, social science, humanities, and business. They typically follow a standard format that includes an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion sections.

Technical Report

A technical report is a detailed report that provides information about a specific technical or scientific problem or project. Technical reports are often used in engineering, science, and other technical fields to document research and development work.

Progress Report

A progress report provides an update on the progress of a research project or program over a specific period of time. Progress reports are typically used to communicate the status of a project to stakeholders, funders, or project managers.

Feasibility Report

A feasibility report assesses the feasibility of a proposed project or plan, providing an analysis of the potential risks, benefits, and costs associated with the project. Feasibility reports are often used in business, engineering, and other fields to determine the viability of a project before it is undertaken.

Field Report

A field report documents observations and findings from fieldwork, which is research conducted in the natural environment or setting. Field reports are often used in anthropology, ecology, and other social and natural sciences.

Experimental Report

An experimental report documents the results of a scientific experiment, including the hypothesis, methods, results, and conclusions. Experimental reports are often used in biology, chemistry, and other sciences to communicate the results of laboratory experiments.

Case Study Report

A case study report provides an in-depth analysis of a specific case or situation, often used in psychology, social work, and other fields to document and understand complex cases or phenomena.

Literature Review Report

A literature review report synthesizes and summarizes existing research on a specific topic, providing an overview of the current state of knowledge on the subject. Literature review reports are often used in social sciences, education, and other fields to identify gaps in the literature and guide future research.

Research Report Example

Following is a Research Report Example sample for Students:

Title: The Impact of Social Media on Academic Performance among High School Students

This study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and academic performance among high school students. The study utilized a quantitative research design, which involved a survey questionnaire administered to a sample of 200 high school students. The findings indicate that there is a negative correlation between social media use and academic performance, suggesting that excessive social media use can lead to poor academic performance among high school students. The results of this study have important implications for educators, parents, and policymakers, as they highlight the need for strategies that can help students balance their social media use and academic responsibilities.

Introduction:

Social media has become an integral part of the lives of high school students. With the widespread use of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat, students can connect with friends, share photos and videos, and engage in discussions on a range of topics. While social media offers many benefits, concerns have been raised about its impact on academic performance. Many studies have found a negative correlation between social media use and academic performance among high school students (Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Paul, Baker, & Cochran, 2012).

Given the growing importance of social media in the lives of high school students, it is important to investigate its impact on academic performance. This study aims to address this gap by examining the relationship between social media use and academic performance among high school students.

Methodology:

The study utilized a quantitative research design, which involved a survey questionnaire administered to a sample of 200 high school students. The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and was designed to measure the frequency and duration of social media use, as well as academic performance.

The participants were selected using a convenience sampling technique, and the survey questionnaire was distributed in the classroom during regular school hours. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.

The findings indicate that the majority of high school students use social media platforms on a daily basis, with Facebook being the most popular platform. The results also show a negative correlation between social media use and academic performance, suggesting that excessive social media use can lead to poor academic performance among high school students.

Discussion:

The results of this study have important implications for educators, parents, and policymakers. The negative correlation between social media use and academic performance suggests that strategies should be put in place to help students balance their social media use and academic responsibilities. For example, educators could incorporate social media into their teaching strategies to engage students and enhance learning. Parents could limit their children’s social media use and encourage them to prioritize their academic responsibilities. Policymakers could develop guidelines and policies to regulate social media use among high school students.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the negative impact of social media on academic performance among high school students. The findings highlight the need for strategies that can help students balance their social media use and academic responsibilities. Further research is needed to explore the specific mechanisms by which social media use affects academic performance and to develop effective strategies for addressing this issue.

Limitations:

One limitation of this study is the use of convenience sampling, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other populations. Future studies should use random sampling techniques to increase the representativeness of the sample. Another limitation is the use of self-reported measures, which may be subject to social desirability bias. Future studies could use objective measures of social media use and academic performance, such as tracking software and school records.

Implications:

The findings of this study have important implications for educators, parents, and policymakers. Educators could incorporate social media into their teaching strategies to engage students and enhance learning. For example, teachers could use social media platforms to share relevant educational resources and facilitate online discussions. Parents could limit their children’s social media use and encourage them to prioritize their academic responsibilities. They could also engage in open communication with their children to understand their social media use and its impact on their academic performance. Policymakers could develop guidelines and policies to regulate social media use among high school students. For example, schools could implement social media policies that restrict access during class time and encourage responsible use.

References:

• Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245.
• Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M., & Cochran, J. D. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 8(1), 1-19.
• Pantic, I. (2014). Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 652-657.
• Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948-958.

Note*: Above mention, Example is just a sample for the students’ guide. Do not directly copy and paste as your College or University assignment. Kindly do some research and Write your own.

Applications of Research Report

Research reports have many applications, including:

• Communicating research findings: The primary application of a research report is to communicate the results of a study to other researchers, stakeholders, or the general public. The report serves as a way to share new knowledge, insights, and discoveries with others in the field.
• Informing policy and practice : Research reports can inform policy and practice by providing evidence-based recommendations for decision-makers. For example, a research report on the effectiveness of a new drug could inform regulatory agencies in their decision-making process.
• Supporting further research: Research reports can provide a foundation for further research in a particular area. Other researchers may use the findings and methodology of a report to develop new research questions or to build on existing research.
• Evaluating programs and interventions : Research reports can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of programs and interventions in achieving their intended outcomes. For example, a research report on a new educational program could provide evidence of its impact on student performance.
• Demonstrating impact : Research reports can be used to demonstrate the impact of research funding or to evaluate the success of research projects. By presenting the findings and outcomes of a study, research reports can show the value of research to funders and stakeholders.
• Enhancing professional development : Research reports can be used to enhance professional development by providing a source of information and learning for researchers and practitioners in a particular field. For example, a research report on a new teaching methodology could provide insights and ideas for educators to incorporate into their own practice.

How to write Research Report

Here are some steps you can follow to write a research report:

• Identify the research question: The first step in writing a research report is to identify your research question. This will help you focus your research and organize your findings.
• Conduct research : Once you have identified your research question, you will need to conduct research to gather relevant data and information. This can involve conducting experiments, reviewing literature, or analyzing data.
• Organize your findings: Once you have gathered all of your data, you will need to organize your findings in a way that is clear and understandable. This can involve creating tables, graphs, or charts to illustrate your results.
• Write the report: Once you have organized your findings, you can begin writing the report. Start with an introduction that provides background information and explains the purpose of your research. Next, provide a detailed description of your research methods and findings. Finally, summarize your results and draw conclusions based on your findings.
• Proofread and edit: After you have written your report, be sure to proofread and edit it carefully. Check for grammar and spelling errors, and make sure that your report is well-organized and easy to read.
• Include a reference list: Be sure to include a list of references that you used in your research. This will give credit to your sources and allow readers to further explore the topic if they choose.
• Format your report: Finally, format your report according to the guidelines provided by your instructor or organization. This may include formatting requirements for headings, margins, fonts, and spacing.

Purpose of Research Report

The purpose of a research report is to communicate the results of a research study to a specific audience, such as peers in the same field, stakeholders, or the general public. The report provides a detailed description of the research methods, findings, and conclusions.

Some common purposes of a research report include:

• Sharing knowledge: A research report allows researchers to share their findings and knowledge with others in their field. This helps to advance the field and improve the understanding of a particular topic.
• Identifying trends: A research report can identify trends and patterns in data, which can help guide future research and inform decision-making.
• Addressing problems: A research report can provide insights into problems or issues and suggest solutions or recommendations for addressing them.
• Evaluating programs or interventions : A research report can evaluate the effectiveness of programs or interventions, which can inform decision-making about whether to continue, modify, or discontinue them.
• Meeting regulatory requirements: In some fields, research reports are required to meet regulatory requirements, such as in the case of drug trials or environmental impact studies.

When to Write Research Report

A research report should be written after completing the research study. This includes collecting data, analyzing the results, and drawing conclusions based on the findings. Once the research is complete, the report should be written in a timely manner while the information is still fresh in the researcher’s mind.

In academic settings, research reports are often required as part of coursework or as part of a thesis or dissertation. In this case, the report should be written according to the guidelines provided by the instructor or institution.

In other settings, such as in industry or government, research reports may be required to inform decision-making or to comply with regulatory requirements. In these cases, the report should be written as soon as possible after the research is completed in order to inform decision-making in a timely manner.

Overall, the timing of when to write a research report depends on the purpose of the research, the expectations of the audience, and any regulatory requirements that need to be met. However, it is important to complete the report in a timely manner while the information is still fresh in the researcher’s mind.

Characteristics of Research Report

There are several characteristics of a research report that distinguish it from other types of writing. These characteristics include:

• Objective: A research report should be written in an objective and unbiased manner. It should present the facts and findings of the research study without any personal opinions or biases.
• Systematic: A research report should be written in a systematic manner. It should follow a clear and logical structure, and the information should be presented in a way that is easy to understand and follow.
• Detailed: A research report should be detailed and comprehensive. It should provide a thorough description of the research methods, results, and conclusions.
• Accurate : A research report should be accurate and based on sound research methods. The findings and conclusions should be supported by data and evidence.
• Organized: A research report should be well-organized. It should include headings and subheadings to help the reader navigate the report and understand the main points.
• Clear and concise: A research report should be written in clear and concise language. The information should be presented in a way that is easy to understand, and unnecessary jargon should be avoided.
• Citations and references: A research report should include citations and references to support the findings and conclusions. This helps to give credit to other researchers and to provide readers with the opportunity to further explore the topic.

Advantages of Research Report

Research reports have several advantages, including:

• Communicating research findings: Research reports allow researchers to communicate their findings to a wider audience, including other researchers, stakeholders, and the general public. This helps to disseminate knowledge and advance the understanding of a particular topic.
• Providing evidence for decision-making : Research reports can provide evidence to inform decision-making, such as in the case of policy-making, program planning, or product development. The findings and conclusions can help guide decisions and improve outcomes.
• Supporting further research: Research reports can provide a foundation for further research on a particular topic. Other researchers can build on the findings and conclusions of the report, which can lead to further discoveries and advancements in the field.
• Demonstrating expertise: Research reports can demonstrate the expertise of the researchers and their ability to conduct rigorous and high-quality research. This can be important for securing funding, promotions, and other professional opportunities.
• Meeting regulatory requirements: In some fields, research reports are required to meet regulatory requirements, such as in the case of drug trials or environmental impact studies. Producing a high-quality research report can help ensure compliance with these requirements.

Limitations of Research Report

Despite their advantages, research reports also have some limitations, including:

• Time-consuming: Conducting research and writing a report can be a time-consuming process, particularly for large-scale studies. This can limit the frequency and speed of producing research reports.
• Expensive: Conducting research and producing a report can be expensive, particularly for studies that require specialized equipment, personnel, or data. This can limit the scope and feasibility of some research studies.
• Limited generalizability: Research studies often focus on a specific population or context, which can limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations or contexts.
• Potential bias : Researchers may have biases or conflicts of interest that can influence the findings and conclusions of the research study. Additionally, participants may also have biases or may not be representative of the larger population, which can limit the validity and reliability of the findings.
• Accessibility: Research reports may be written in technical or academic language, which can limit their accessibility to a wider audience. Additionally, some research may be behind paywalls or require specialized access, which can limit the ability of others to read and use the findings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Future Research – Thesis Guide

Research Project – Definition, Writing Guide and...

Dissertation vs Thesis – Key Differences

Appendices – Writing Guide, Types and Examples

Scope of the Research – Writing Guide and...

Ethical Considerations – Types, Examples and...

Uncomplicated Reviews of Educational Research Methods

• Writing a Research Report

.pdf version of this page

This review covers the basic elements of a research report. This is a general guide for what you will see in journal articles or dissertations. This format assumes a mixed methods study, but you can leave out either quantitative or qualitative sections if you only used a single methodology.

This review is divided into sections for easy reference. There are five MAJOR parts of a Research Report:

1.    Introduction 2.    Review of Literature 3.    Methods 4.    Results 5.    Discussion

As a general guide, the Introduction, Review of Literature, and Methods should be about 1/3 of your paper, Discussion 1/3, then Results 1/3.

Section 1 : Cover Sheet (APA format cover sheet) optional, if required.

Section 2: Abstract (a basic summary of the report, including sample, treatment, design, results, and implications) (≤ 150 words) optional, if required.

Section 3 : Introduction (1-3 paragraphs) •    Basic introduction •    Supportive statistics (can be from periodicals) •    Statement of Purpose •    Statement of Significance

Section 4 : Research question(s) or hypotheses •    An overall research question (optional) •    A quantitative-based (hypotheses) •    A qualitative-based (research questions) Note: You will generally have more than one, especially if using hypotheses.

Section 5: Review of Literature ▪    Should be organized by subheadings ▪    Should adequately support your study using supporting, related, and/or refuting evidence ▪    Is a synthesis, not a collection of individual summaries

Section 6: Methods ▪    Procedure: Describe data gathering or participant recruitment, including IRB approval ▪    Sample: Describe the sample or dataset, including basic demographics ▪    Setting: Describe the setting, if applicable (generally only in qualitative designs) ▪    Treatment: If applicable, describe, in detail, how you implemented the treatment ▪    Instrument: Describe, in detail, how you implemented the instrument; Describe the reliability and validity associated with the instrument ▪    Data Analysis: Describe type of procedure (t-test, interviews, etc.) and software (if used)

Section 7: Results ▪    Restate Research Question 1 (Quantitative) ▪    Describe results ▪    Restate Research Question 2 (Qualitative) ▪    Describe results

Section 8: Discussion ▪    Restate Overall Research Question ▪    Describe how the results, when taken together, answer the overall question ▪    ***Describe how the results confirm or contrast the literature you reviewed

Section 9: Recommendations (if applicable, generally related to practice)

Section 10: Limitations ▪    Discuss, in several sentences, the limitations of this study. ▪    Research Design (overall, then info about the limitations of each separately) ▪    Sample ▪    Instrument/s ▪    Other limitations

Section 11: Conclusion (A brief closing summary)

Section 12: References (APA format)

Share this:

About research rundowns.

Research Rundowns was made possible by support from the Dewar College of Education at Valdosta State University .

• Experimental Design
• What is Educational Research?
• Writing Research Questions
• Mixed Methods Research Designs
• Qualitative Coding & Analysis
• Qualitative Research Design
• Correlation
• Effect Size
• Instrument, Validity, Reliability
• Mean & Standard Deviation
• Significance Testing (t-tests)
• Steps 1-4: Finding Research
• Steps 5-6: Analyzing & Organizing
• Steps 7-9: Citing & Writing

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Twenty years of Wikipedia in scholarly publications: a bibliometric network analysis of the thematic and citation landscape

• Published: 14 February 2023
• Volume 57 , pages 5623–5653, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

• Mohamed M. Mostafa 1  

737 Accesses

21 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Wikipedia has grown to be the biggest online encyclopedia in terms of comprehensiveness, reach and coverage. However, although different websites and social network platforms have received considerable academic attention, Wikipedia has largely gone unnoticed. In this study, we fill this research gap by investigating how Wikipedia is used in scholarly publications since its launch in 2001. More specifically, we review and analyze the intellectual structure of Wikipedia’s scholarly publications based on 3790 Web of Science core collection documents written by 10,636 authors from 100 countries over two decades (2001–2021). Results show that the most influential outlets publishing Wikipedia research include journals such as Plos one, Nucleic Acids Research, the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, IEEE Access, and Information Processing and Management . Results also show that the author collaboration network is very sparsely connected, indicating the absence of close collaboration among the authors in the field. Furthermore, results reveal that the Wikipedia research institutions’ collaboration network reflects a North–South divide as very limited cooperation occurs between developed and developing countries’ institutions. Finally, the multiple correspondence analysis applied to obtain the Wikipedia research conceptual map reveals the breadth, diversity, and intellectual thrust of the Wikipedia’s scholarly publications. Our analysis has far-reaching implications for aspiring researchers interested in Wikipedia research as we retrospectively trace the evolution in research output over the last two decades, establish linkages between the authors and articles, and reveal trending topics/hotspots within the broad theme of Wikipedia research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

(Adapted from Chen et al. 2020a , b )

Similar content being viewed by others

Methodological issues in measuring citations in Wikipedia: a case study in Library and Information Science

Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016), co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in spanish information science literature, 1985–2014, explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q., Tague, J.: Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics 14 , 421–433 (1988)

Article   Google Scholar  

Aleixandre, J., Aleixandre-Tudo, J., Bolanos-Pizarro, M., Aleixandre-Benavent, R.: Mapping the scientific research in organic farming: a bibliometric review. Scientometrics 105 , 295–309 (2015)

Al-Khalifa, H.: Scientometric assessment of Saudi publication productivity in computer science in the period of 1978–2012. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. 10 , 194–208 (2014)

Arazy, O., Nov, O., Patterson, R., Yeo, L.: Information quality in Wikipedia: the effects of group composition and task conflict. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27 , 71–98 (2011)

Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C.: Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Inform. 11 , 959–975 (2017)

Aryadoust, V., Ang, B: Exploring the frontiers of eye tracking research in language studies: a novel co-citation scientometric review. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. (Forthcoming)

Ávila-Robinson, A., Wakabayashi, N.: Changes in the structures and directions of destination management and marketing research: a bibliometric mapping study, 2005–2016. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 10 , 101–111 (2018)

Google Scholar  

Azad, H., Deepak, A.: A new approach for query expansion using Wikipedia and WordNet. Inf. Sci. 492 , 147–163 (2019)

Baker, H., Kumar, S., Pandey, N.: Abibliometric analysis of managerial finance: a retrospective. Manag. Finance 46 , 1495–1517 (2020)

Bakshy, E., Hofman, J., Mason, W., Watts, D.: Everyone’s an influencer. In: King, I., Nejdl, W., Li, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining – WSDM’11, p. 65. ACM Press, New York (2011)

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Banckendorff, P.: Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: a social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994–2007). J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 16 , 1–15 (2009)

Barabasi, A., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T.: Evolution of the social network of scientific collaboration. Phys. A 311 , 590–614 (2000)

Behrendt, S., Peter, F., Zimmermann, D.: An encyclopedia for stock markets? Wikipedia searches and stock returns. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 72 , 101563 (2020)

Block, J., Fisch, C., Rehan, F.: Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis. Manag. Rev. q. 70 , 591–627 (2020)

Bouzembrak, Y., Kluche, M., Gavai, A., Marvin, H.: Internet of Things in food safety: literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 94 , 54–64 (2019)

-Brazzeal, B.: Citations to Wikipedia in chemistry journals: a preliminary study. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 67 ( http://www.istl.org/11-fall/refereed2.html ) (2011)

Brown, A.: Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: Accuracy and completeness of coverage. Polit. Sci. Polit. 44 , 339–343 (2011)

Burt, R.: Structural Holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1992)

Book   Google Scholar  

Burt, R.: The social capital of opinion leaders. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 566 , 37–54 (1999)

Cai, K., Spangler, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, L.: Leveraging sentiment analysis for topic detection. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 8 , 291–302 (2010)

Callon, M., Courtial, J., Laville, F.: Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22 , 155–205 (1991)

Chen, C.: Visualization of knowledge structures. Handb. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 2 , 700–744 (2002)

Chen, C., Leydesdorff, L.: Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: a new method of publication portfolio analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 65 , 334–351 (2014)

Chen, X., Liu, Y.: Visualization analysis of high-speed railway research based on CiteSpace. Transp. Policy 85 , 1–17 (2020)

Chen, C., Paul, R.: Visualizing a knowledge domain’s intellectual structure. Computer 34 , 65–71 (2001)

Chen, C., Song, I., Yuan, X., Zhang, J.: The thematic and citation landscape of data and knowledge engineering (1985–2007). Data Knowl. Eng. 67 , 234–250 (2008)

Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., Tseng, H.: Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 12 , 593–608 (2012)

Chen, C., Dublin, R., Kim, M.: Orphan drugs and rare diseases: a scientometric review (2000–2014). Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs 2 , 709–724 (2014)

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H.: Fifty years of British journal of educational technology: a topic modeling based bibliometric perspective. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 51 , 692–708 (2020a)

Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Xie, H.: Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: a retrospective of all volumes of computers & education. Comput. Educ. 151 , 103855 (2020b)

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G.: Twenty years of personalized language learning: topic modeling and knowledge mapping. Educ. Technol. Soc. 24 , 205–222 (2021)

Chi, E.: Using information scent to model user information needs and actions on the web. In Proceedings of the SIGGHI Conference on Human Factor in Computing Systems. ACM, pp. 490–497 (2001)

Chun-Hao, C., Jian-Min, Y.: A bibliometric study of financial risk literature: a historic approach. Appl. Econ. 44 , 2827–2839 (2012)

Cobo, M., Lopez-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J. Informetr. 5 , 146–166 (2011a)

Cobo, M., Lopez-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62 , 1382–1402 (2011b)

Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., Noe, C., Strozzi, F.: Information sharing in supply chains: a review of risks and opportunities using the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA). Supply Chain Manag. 24 , 5–21 (2019)

Coquide, C., Emann, L., Lages, J., Shepelyansky, D.: World influence and interactions of universities from Wikipedia networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 92 (1), 3 (2019)

Corbet, S., Dowling, M., Gao, X., Huang, S., Lucey, B., Vigne, S.: An analysis of the intellectual structure of research on financial economics of precious metals. Resour. Policy 63 , 101416 (2019)

Corte, V., Gaudio, G., Sepe, F.: Ethical food and the Kosher certification: a literature review. Br. Food J. 120 , 2270–2288 (2018)

Cress, U., Kimmerle, J.: A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 3 , 105–122 (2008)

Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., Sarto, F.: Foundations and trends in performance management: a twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics 108 , 595–611 (2016)

da Silva, S., Antonio, N., Carvalho, J.: Analysis of the service dominant logic network, authors, and articles. Serv. Ind. J. 37 , 125–152 (2017)

de la Hoz-Correa, A., Munoz-Leiva, F., Bakuca, M.: Past themes and future trends in medical tourism research: a co-word analysis. Tour. Manag. 65 , 200–211 (2018)

Demiroz, F., Haase, T.: The concept of resilience: a bibliographic analysis of the emergency and disaster management literature. Local Gov. Stud. 45 , 308–327 (2019)

Dewald, N.: Future voices in public services. Public Serv. Q. 10 , 245–251 (2014)

Diekmann, F., Ford, R., Harisson, S., Regnier, E., Venkatesh, R.: Bibliometric analysis of the literature on Giant Ragweed ( Ambrosia trifida L.). J. Agric. Food Inf. 14 , 290–320 (2013)

DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W., Robinson, J.: Social implications of the internet. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27 , 307–336 (2001)

Ding, Y.: Scientific collaboration and endorsement: network analysis of co-authorship and citation networks. J. Informetr. 5 , 187–203 (2011)

Dobusch, L., Kapeller, J.: A guide to paradigmatic self-marginalization: lessons for post-Keynesian economists. Rev. Polit. Econ. 24 , 469–487 (2012)

Ezell, J.: Empathy plasticity: decolonizing and reorganizing wikipedia and other online spaces to address racial equity. Ethn. Racial Stud. (Forthcoming)

Fang, Y., Yin, J., Wu, B.: Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. J. Sustain. Tour. 26 , 108–126 (2018)

Findlay, K., van Rensburg, O.: Using interaction networks to map communities on Twitter. Int. J. Mark. Res. 60 , 169–189 (2018)

Flanagin, A., Metzger, M.: From encyclopedia britannica to wikipedia. Inf. Commun. Soc. 14 , 355–374 (2011)

Forte, A., Larco, V., Bruckman, A.: Decentralization in Wikipedia governance. J MIS 26 (1), 49–72 (2009)

Francisco, G., Enrique, C., Bartolome, M., Mercedes, U.: Identifying the ‘knowledge base’ or ‘intellectual structure’ of research on international business, 2000–2015: a citation/co-citation analysis of JIBS. Int. Bus. Rev. 28 , 713–726 (2019)

Gaede, J., Rowlands, I.: Visualizing social acceptance research: a bibliometric review of the social acceptance literature for energy technology and fuels. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 40 , 142–158 (2018)

Garfield, E., Malin, M., & Small, H.: Citation data as science indicators. Eds. Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. Merton, R. Thackray, A., & H. Zuckerman, pp. 179–208. Wiley, New York (1978)

Gavel, Y., Iselid, L.: Web of science and scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Inf. Rev. 32 , 8–21 (2008)

Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J., Popa, S.: Twenty years of the journal of knowledge management: a bibliometric analysis. J. Knowl. Manag. 22 , 1655–1687 (2018)

Gheisari, M., Esmaeili, B.: Applications and requirements of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) for construction safety. Saf. Sci. 118 , 230–240 (2019)

Giles, J.: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature 438 , 900–901 (2006)

Glänzel, W., Schubert, A.: Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed, H., Glanzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds.) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)

Glötzl, F., Aigner, E.: Orthodox core-heterodox periphery? Contrasting citation networks of economics departments in Vienna. Rev. Polit. Econ. 30 , 210–240 (2018)

Gobel, S., Munzert, S.: Political advertising on the Wikipedia marketplace of information. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 36 , 157–175 (2018)

Gonzales-Valiente, C.: Redes de citación de revistas iberoamericanas de bibliotecología y ciencia de la información en Scopus. Bibliotecas Anal. Investig. 15 , 83–98 (2019)

Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., Takhteyev, Y.: Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. Am. Behav. Sci. 55 , 1294–1318 (2011)

Gupta, R., Pandey, R., Sebastian, V.: International entrepreneurial orientation (IEO): a bibliometric overview of scholarly research. J. Bus. Res. 125 , 74–88 (2021)

Haythornthwaite, C.: Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library Inform. Sci. Res. 18 , 323–342 (1996)

Himelboim, I., Han, J.: Cancer talk on Twitter: community structure and information sources in breast and prostate cancer social networks. J. Health Commun. 19 , 210–225 (2014)

Himelboim, I., Smith, M., Shneiderman, B.: Tweeting apart: applying network analysis to detect selective exposure clusters in Twitter. Commun. Methods Meas. 7 , 195–223 (2013)

Hjorland, B.: Citation analysis: a social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Inf. Process. Manage 49 , 1313–1325 (2013)

Holub, M., Johnson, J.: Bitcoin research across disciplines. Inf. Sci. 34 , 114–126 (2018)

Hu, J., Zhang, Y.: Structure and patterns of cross-national big data research collaborations. J. Doc. 73 , 1119–1136 (2017)

Jayantha, W., Oladinrin, O.: Knowledge mapping of office workspace: a scientometric review of studies. Facilities (Forthcoming)

Jiang, Y., Bai, W., Zhang, X., Hu, J.: Wikipedia-based information content and semantic similarity computation. Inf. Process. Manag. 53 , 248–265 (2017)

Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B., Benckendorff, P.: Bibliometric visualization: an application to tourism crisis and disaster research. Curr. Issue Tour. 22 , 1925–1957 (2019)

Jullien, N.: What we know about Wikipedia: a review of the literature analyzing the project(s). 86 (2012)

Keegan, B., Gergle, D., Contractor, N.: Hot off the Wiki: structures and dynamics of Wikipedia’s coverage of breaking news events. Am. Behav. Sci. 57 , 595–622 (2013)

Khan, G., Wood, J.: Knowledge networks of the information technology management domain: A social network analysis approach. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 39 , 367–397 (2016)

Khasseh, A., Soheili, F., Moghaddam, N., Chelak, A.: Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrivs: a co-word analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 53 , 705–720 (2017)

Kim, M., Chen, C.: A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics 104 , 239–263 (2015)

Kim, J., Kim, S., Lee, C.: Anticipating technological convergence: link prediction using Wikipedia hyperlinks. Technovation 79 , 25–34 (2019)

Knoke, D., Yang, S.: Social Network Analysis. SAGE, Los Angeles, CA (2010)

Koppen, L., Phillips, J., Papageorgiou, R.: Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 103 , 140–144 (2015)

Korfiatis, N., Poulos, M., Bokos, G.: Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: an insight from Wikipedia. Online Inf. Rev. 30 , 252–262 (2006)

Kosterich, A., Weber, M.: Transformation of a modern newsroom workforce: a case study of NYC journalist network histories from 2011 to 2015. J. Pract. 13 , 431–457 (2019)

Krauskopf, E.: A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Infection and Public Health: 2008–2016. J. Infect. Public Health 11 , 224–229 (2018)

Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Haldar, A.: Twenty years of public management review (PMR): a bibliometric overview. Public Manag. Rev. 22 , 1876–1896 (2020)

Laengle, S., Modak, N., Merigo, J., de la Sotta, C.: Thirty years of the international journal of computer integrated manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 31 , 1247–1268 (2018)

Lamprecht, D., Strohmaier, M., Helic, D., Nyulas, C., Tudorache, T., Noy, N., Mark, A.: Using ontologies to model human navigation behavior in information networks: a study based on Wikipedia. Semant. Web 6 , 403–422 (2015)

Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., Wittaker, J.: Policy and the mapping of scientific change: a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics 14 , 251–264 (1988)

Lee, M., Chen, T.: Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: from 1995 to 2010. Knowl.-Based Syst. 28 , 47–58 (2012)

Leong, C., Lee, Y., Mak, W.: Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 , 2584–2589 (2012)

Levitt, P.: Religion on the move: mapping global cultural production and consumption. In: Bender, C., et al. (eds.) Religion on the Edge: De-Centering and Re-Centering the Sociology of Religion, pp. 159–176. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

Lin, J., Himelboim, I.: Political brand communities as social network clusters: winning and training candidates in the GOP 2016 primary elections. J. Polit. Mark. 16 , 1–29 (2018)

Linnenluecke M.K., Singh, A.: Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust. J. Manag. (Forthcoming)

Lotka, A.: The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)

Mas-Tur, A., Brandtner, M., Ewert, R., Kursten, W.: Advances in management research: a bibliometric overview of the review of managerial science. RMS 14 , 933–958 (2020)

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27 , 415–444 (2001)

Merediz-Sola, I., Bariviera, A.: A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Res. Int. Bus. Finance 50 , 294–305 (2019)

Mestyan, M., Yasseri, T., Kertesz, J.: Early prediction of movie box office success based on Wikipedia activity big data. PLoS ONE 8 (8), e71226 (2013)

Milgram, S.: The small-world problem. Psychol. Today 2 , 60–67 (1967)

Moat, H., Curme, C., Avakian, A., Kenett, D., Stanley, H., Preis, T.: Quantifying Wikipedia usage patterns before stock market moves. Sci. Rep. 3 , 1801 (2013)

Moradi, S.: The scientometrics of literature on smart cities. Libr. Hi Tech (Forthcoming)

Mostafa, M.: Do products’ warning labels affect consumer safe behavior? A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J. Bus. Econ. Stud. 22 , 24–39 (2015)

Mostafa, M.: Do consumers recall products’ warning labels? a meta-analysis. Int. J. Manag. Mark. Res. 9 , 81–96 (2016)

Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell-Cunill, O., Merigo, J., Genovart-Balaguer, J., Mauleon-Mendez, E.: Twenty-five years of the journal of travel & tourism marketing: a bibliometric ranking. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 35 , 1201–1221 (2018)

Navarrete, T., Borowiecki, K.: Changes in cultural consumption: ethnographic collections in Wikipedia. Cult. Trends 25 , 233–248 (2016)

Neff, M., Corley, E.: 35 years and 160,000 articles: a bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics 80 , 657–682 (2009)

Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A., Wrede, C.: The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: an empirical study. Libr. Acad. 6 , 127–141 (2006)

Newman, M., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69 , 1–15 (2004)

Nisonger, T.: A methodological issue concerning the use of social sciences citation index journal citation reports impact factor data for journal ranking. Libr. Acquis. Pract. Theory 18 , 447–458 (1994)

Okoli, C.: A brief review of studies of Wikipedia in peer-reviewed journals. In: 2009 Third International Conference on Digital Society, pp. 155–160. IEEE (2009)

Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of literature. Libri 46 , 149–158 (1996)

Park, S., Lim, Y., Park, H.: Comparing Twitter and YouTube networks in information diffusion: The case of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 95 , 208–217 (2015)

Pieters, P., Baumgartner, H., Vermunt, J., Bijmolt, T.: Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the international journal of research in marketing. Int. J. Res. Mark. 16 , 113–127 (1999)

Pirolli, P., Fu, W.: SNIF-ACT: a model of information foraging on the World Wide Web. In: The 9th International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, New York (2003)

Pirolli, P., Card, S.: Information Foraging. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)

Portugal-Ferreira, M., Frias-Pinto, C., Ribeiro-Serra, F.: The transaction costs theory in international business research: a bibliometric study over three decades. Scientometrics 98 , 1899–1922 (2014)

Price, D., Beaver, D.: Collaboration in an invisible college. Am. Psychol. 21 , 1011–1018 (1966)

Prieto-Gutierrez, J., Segado-Boj, F.: Annals of library and information studies: a bibliometric analysis of the journal and a comparison with the top library and information studies in Asia and worldwide. Ser. Libr. (Forthcoming)

Qi, T., Wang, T., Ma, Y., Zhang, W., Zhu, Y.: A scientometric analysis of e-participation research. Int. J. Crowd Sci. 2 , 136–148 (2018)

Qian, J., Law, R., Wei, J.: Knowledge mapping in travel website studies: a scientometric review. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 19 , 192–209 (2019)

Qin, H., Prastyo, Y., Bass, M., Sanders, C., Prentice, E., Nguyen, Q.: Seeing the forest for the tree: a bibliometric analysis of environmental and resource sociology. Soc. Nat. Resour. 3 , 1131–1148 (2020)

R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria ( www.R-project.org ) (2021).

Ratkiewicz, J., Menczer, F., Fortunato, S., Flammini, A.: Traffic in social media II: modeling bursty popularity. In: IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 393–400 (2010)

Rivera, M., Pizam, A.: Advances in hospitality research: “from Rodney Dangerfield to Aretha Franklin.” Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 27 , 362–378 (2015)

Rodi, G., Loreto, V., Tria, F.: Search strategies of Wikipedia readers. PLoS ONE 12 (2), e0170746 (2017)

Rollin, G., Lages, J., Shepelyansky, D.: Wikipedia network analysis of cancer interactions and world influence. PLoS ONE 14 (9), e0222508 (2019)

Rosensweig, R.: Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past. J. Am. History 93 , 117–146 (2006)

Ruiz-Alba, J., Guzman-Parra, V., Oblitas, J., Mediano, J.: Entrepreneurial intentions: a bibliometric analysis. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2 , 121–213 (2021)

Sankey, H.: Introductory note on the thermal efficiency of stream-engines. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, pp. 278–283 (1898)

Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis. Sage, London (2013)

Shafee, T., Masukume, G., Kipersztok, L., Das, D., Häggström, M., Heilman, J.: Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content: past, present and future. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 71 , 1122–1129 (2017)

Shannon, C., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL (1949)

Shi, F., Teplitsky, M., Duede, E., Evans, J.: The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3 , 329–336 (2019)

Shiau, W., Dwivedi, Y., Yang, H.: Co-citation and cluster analysis of extant literature on social networks. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37 , 390–399 (2017)

Shirky, C.: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin Press, New York (2008)

Skupin, A.: The world of geography: visualizing a knowledge domain with cartographic means. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. U. S. a. 101 , 5274–5278 (2004)

Skupin, A.: Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: Implications for knowledge domain visualization. J. Informetr. 3 , 233–245 (2009)

Smith, N., Graham, T.: Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22 , 1310–1327 (2019)

Soundararajan, K., Ho, H., Su, B.: Sankey diagram framework for energy and exergy flows. Appl. Energy 136 , 1035–1042 (2014)

Space, D., Owens, K.: Lexical co-occurrence and association strength. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 19 , 317–330 (1990)

Su, H., Lee, P.: Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in technology foresight. Scientometrics 85 , 65–79 (2010)

Surowiecki, J., Silverman, M.: The wisdom of the crowds. Am. J. Phys. 75 , 190 (2007)

Talukdar, D.: Research productivity patterns in the organizational behavior and human resource management literature. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 26 , 467–484 (2015)

Tang, M., Liao, H., Wan, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., Rosen, M.: Ten years of sustainability (2009 to 2018): a bibliometric overview. Sustainability 10 , 1655 (2018a)

Tang, M., Liao, H., Rosen, M.: A bibliometric overview and visualization of the international journal of fuzzy systems between 2007 and 2017. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20 , 1403–1422 (2018b)

Tausczik, Y., Faasse, K., Pennebaker, J., Petrie, K.: Public anxiety and information seeking following the H1N1 outbreak: blogs, newspaper articles, and Wikipedia visits. Health Commun. 27 , 179–185 (2012)

The Economist (January 9th 2921). The other giant, pp. 49–50

Thompson, N., Hanley, D.: Science is shaped by Wikipedia: evidence from a randomized control trial. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5238-17. SSRN-ID 3039505 (2019)

Tomaszewski, R., MacDonald, K.: A study of citations to Wikipedia in scholarly publications. Sci. Technol. Libr. 35 , 246–261 (2016)

Trier, M., Molka-Danielsen, J.: Sympathy or strategy: social capital drivers for collaborative contributions to the IS community. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22 , 317–335 (2013)

Valenzuela-Fernandez, L., Merigo, J., Lichtenthal, J., Nicolas, C.: A bibliometric analysis of the first 25 years of the journal of business-to-business marketing. J. Bus. Bus. Mark. 26 , 75–94 (2019)

van Eck, N., Waltman, L.: Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., Wolfram, D. (eds.) Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice. Springer, New York (2014)

van Eck, N., Waltman, L.: VOSviewer, Version 1.6.13 (2019)

Vanni, T., Mesa-Frias, M., Sanchez-Garcia, R., Roesler, R., et al.: International scientific cooperation in HIV and HPV: a network analysis. PLoS ONE 9 (3), e93376 (2014)

Vidgen, R., Henneberg, S., Naude, P.: What sort of community is the European conference on information systems? A social network analysis 1993–2005. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22 , 317–335 (2007)

Vieira, F., Brito, C.: Science mapping in industrial marketing. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 16 , 5–19 (2015)

Vila-Lopez, N., Kuster-Boluda, I.: A bibliometric analysis on packaging research: towards sustainable and healthy packages. Br. Food J. 123 , 684–701 (2021)

Vos, T., Heinderyckx, F.: Gatekeeping in Transition. Routledge, New York (2015)

Wakefield, R.: Networks of accounting research: a citation-based structural and network analysis. Br. Account. Rev. 40 , 228–244 (2008)

Wallace, J.: Modeling contemporary gatekeeping: the rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital new dissemination. Digit. Journal. 6 , 274–293 (2018)

Wallace, D., Fleet, C.: The democratization of information? Ref. User Serv. Q. 45 , 10–102 (2005)

Wamba, S., Mishra, D.: Big data integration with business processes: a literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 23 , 477–492 (2017)

Wang, C., Lim, M., Zhao, L., Tseng, M., Chien, C., Lev, B.: The evolution of omega-the international journal of management science over the past 40 years: a bibliometric overview. Omega

Wäsche, H., Dickson, G., Woll, A., Brandes, U.: Social network analysis in sport research: an emerging paradigm. Eur. J. Sport Soc. 14 , 138–165 (2017)

Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393 , 440–442 (1998)

West, R., Pineau, J., Precup, D.: Wikipedia: an online game for inferring semantic distances between concepts. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 1598–1603 (2009)

-West, R., Paranjape, A., Leskovec, J.: Mining missing hyperlinks from human navigation traces: a case study of Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1242–1252. ACM (2015)

-Wetzstein, A., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., Benton, W.: Uncovering the supplier selection knowledge structure: a systematic citation network analysis from 1991 to 2017. J. Purch. Supply Manag. (Forthcoming)

Wilkerson, B.: Using Wikipedia page views to measure the mass salience of US Supreme Court decisions. In: The Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 16 (2015)

Wong, W., Mittas, N., Arvanitou, E., Li, Y.: A bibliometric assessment of software engineering themes. Schools and institutions (2013–2020). J. Syst. Softw. 180 , 111029 (2021)

Wu, G., Cunningham, P.: Integration of multiple network views in Wikipedia. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 45 , 473–490 (2015)

Xu, S., Zhang, X.: Impact of Wikipedia on market information environment: evidence on management disclosure and investor reaction. MIS Q. 37 , 1043–1068 (2013)

Yang, H., Lai, C.: Understanding knowledge-sharing behavior in Wikipedia. Behavi. Inf. Technol. 30 , 131–142 (2011)

Yang, G., Li, G., Li, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Liu, T., Chen, D., Huang, M.: Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value. Scientometrics 105 , 1319–1346 (2015)

Yang, S., Han, R., Wolfram, D., Zhao, Y.: Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): introducing author-keyword coupling analysis. J. Informetr 10 , 132–150 (2016)

Yasseri, T., Bright, J.: Predicting elections from online information flows: towards theoretically informed models. arXiv:1505–01818 (2015)

Zant, S., Frahm, K., Jaffres-Runser, K., Shepelyansky, D.: Interactions and influence of world painters from reduced Google matrix of Wikipedia networks. IEEE Access 6 , 47735–47750 (2018b)

Zant, S., Frahm, K., Jaffres-Runser, K., Shepelyansky, D.: Analysis of world terror networks from the reduced Google matrix of Wikipedia. Eur. Phys. J. B 91 (2018a)

Zeleznik, D., Blazun, H., Kokol, P.: A bibliometric analysis of the journal of advanced nursing: 1976–2015. J. Adv. Nurs. 73 , 2407–2419 (2017)

Zhang, S., Lyu, P., Yan, Y.: Global geographical and scientometric analysis of tourism-themed research. Scientometrics 105 , 385–401 (2015)

Zhang, C., Zheng, X., Su, C., Huang, H., Yan, F., et al.: A bibliometric study of the journal of school health: 1965–2014. Chin. Nurs. Res. 4 , 75–83 (2017)

Zhu, J., Hua, W.: Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 110 , 893–914 (2017)

Zong, Q., Shen, H., Yuan, Q., Hu, X., Hou, Z., Deng, S.: Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: a co-word analysis. Scientometrics 94 , 781–799 (2013)

Zou, X., Yue, W., Vu, H.: Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 118 , 131–145 (2018)

Zupic, I., Cater, T.: Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods 18 , 429–472 (2015)

Download references

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Gulf University for Science and Technology, West Mishref, Kuwait

Mohamed M. Mostafa

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed M. Mostafa .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Mostafa, M.M. Twenty years of Wikipedia in scholarly publications: a bibliometric network analysis of the thematic and citation landscape. Qual Quant 57 , 5623–5653 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01626-7

Download citation

Accepted : 03 February 2023

Published : 14 February 2023

Issue Date : December 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01626-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Bibliometric networks
• Intellectual structure
• Keyword co-occurrence
• Historiography
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Onsite training

3,000,000+ delegates

15,000+ clients

1,000+ locations

• KnowledgePass
• Log a ticket

01344203999 Available 24/7

What is the Importance of Report Writing? A Complete Overview

Reports are the backbone of effective communication in both academic and professional realms. Discover the significance of report writing in our blog on the Importance of Report Writing. Learn how mastering this skill can enhance your ability to convey information, influence decisions, and propel your career to new heights.

Exclusive 40% OFF

Training Outcomes Within Your Budget!

We ensure quality, budget-alignment, and timely delivery by our expert instructors.

Share this Resource

• Creative Writing Course
• E-mail Etiquette Training
• Touch Typing Course
• Data Entry Masterclass
• Office Skills Training

Table of contents   

1) Importance of Report Writing  

    a) Evaluation 

    b) Development of skills 

    c) Investigation 

    d) Quick Location 

    e) Decision making tool 

    f) Neutral presentation of facts 

    g) A managerial tool 

    h) Proper control 

    i) Professional advancement 

    j) Encountering advance and complex situation 

2) Conclusion  

Importance of Report Writing  

Report Writing is a skill that can benefit you in various ways and contexts. Here is the list of reasons reflecting the Importance of Report Writing:  

Evaluation  

The importance of Report Writing can be reflected during the evaluation process. This is because Report Writing can help you evaluate your own or others’ performance, progress, or outcomes. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to assess your learning outcomes, achievements, or challenges in a course or a project. As a teacher, you can write a Report to evaluate your students’ learning outcomes, strengths, or weaknesses in a course or an assignment. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to evaluate your research methods, results, or implications in a study or an experiment. Report Writing can help you identify the gaps, strengths, or areas for improvement in your own or others’ work.  

Development of skill s  

Report Writing can help you develop your skills in various domains and disciplines. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to improve your writing, research, analysis, or presentation skills . If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to enhance your teaching, assessment, feedback, or curriculum design skills. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to advance your knowledge, methodology, innovation, or contribution skills. Report Writing can help you acquire new knowledge, apply existing knowledge, or create new knowledge in your field of interest. 

Investigation  

The Importance of Report Writing also lies in investigating a problem or a topic in-depth and in detail. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to explore a question or an issue that interests you or relates to your course or project. 

At the same time, if you are a teacher, you can write a Report to investigate a pedagogical or educational problem or phenomenon that affects your teaching or learning environment. On the other hand, if you are a researcher, you can write a Report to investigate a scientific or social problem or phenomenon that has significance or relevance for your discipline or society. Report Writing can help you collect, analyse, and present data in an organised and systematic way. 

Quick location  

Report Writing can help you locate information quickly and easily. For example, students can write a Report to summarise the main points and findings of your course or project for future reference or revision. If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to document the key aspects and outcomes of your course or assignment for future use or evaluation. 

At the same time, researchers can write a Report to record the essential details and implications of a study or experiment for future dissemination or publication. Report Writing can help you create an index, an abstract, or an executive summary that can help you access information at a glance . 

Master the art of professional Email Communication with our Email Etiquette Training – boost your online presence and productivity now!  

Decision making tool  

Report Writing acts as a decision-making tool that can assist you in making decisions based on facts and evidence. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to support your arguments or opinions with data and sources in an essay or a debate. If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to justify your decisions or recommendations with data and sources in an assessment or feedback. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to validate your claims or hypotheses with data and sources in a study or an experiment. Thus, Report Writing can help you use logic, reasoning, and analysis to make informed and rational decisions. 

Neutral presentation of facts  

Report Writing can help you present facts in a neutral and objective manner. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to avoid bias or emotion in your writing and use facts and evidence to support your points. If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to avoid bias or emotion in your assessment and use facts and evidence to evaluate your students. 

Researchers can write a Report to avoid bias or emotion in their research and use facts and evidence to demonstrate their findings. Report Writing can help you maintain a professional and ethical tone in your communication. 

A m anagerial t ool  

Report Writing can help you manage your work or project effectively and efficiently. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to plan, organise, and monitor your progress or outcomes in a course or a project. If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to plan, organise, and monitor your activities or objectives in a course or an assignment. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to plan, organise, and monitor your methods or results in a study or an experiment. As a result, Report Writing can help you set goals, allocate resources, and measure performance. 

Unleash your creativity and become a master storyteller with our Creative Writing Training - start your writing journey now!  

Proper c ontrol  

Report Writing helps you control your work or project effectively and efficiently. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to check, review, and revise your work or project before submission or presentation. If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to check, review, and revise your work or project before delivery or evaluation. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to check, review, and revise your work or project before dissemination or publication. Thus, Report Writing can help you ensure quality, accuracy, and consistency in your work or project. 

Professional a dvancement  

The importance of Report Writing lies in advancing and developing your professional career. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to demonstrate your competence, knowledge, and skills in a course or a project. In contrast, if you are a teacher, you can write a Report to demonstrate your competence, knowledge, and skills in a course or an assignment. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to demonstrate your competence, knowledge, and skills in a study or an experiment. Report Writing can help you showcase your achievements, contributions, or innovations in your field of interest. 

Encountering advance and complex situation  

Report Writing can help you encounter advanced and complex situations in your work or project. For example, if you are a student, you can write a Report to deal with challenging questions or issues that arise in your course or project. If you are a teacher, you can write a Report to deal with challenging questions or issues that arise in your course or assignment. 

If you are a researcher, you can write a Report to deal with challenging questions or issues that arise in your study or experiment. Report Writing can help you solve problems, overcome obstacles, or discover new possibilities in your work or project. 

Unlock the power of effective communication with our Report Writing Training - start crafting impactful Reports today!  

Conclusion  

We hope that this blog has helped you understand the Importance of Report Writing and how to use it effectively. Report Writing is a skill that can benefit you in various ways and contexts. So, why not start writing Reports today? You will be amazed by the results! 

Transform your potential into excellence - join our Personal Development Training and embark on a journey of self-improvement!  

Frequently Asked Questions

Upcoming business skills resources batches & dates.

Fri 4th Oct 2024

Fri 6th Dec 2024

Fri 14th Feb 2025

Fri 11th Apr 2025

Fri 13th Jun 2025

Fri 15th Aug 2025

Fri 10th Oct 2025

Fri 12th Dec 2025

Get A Quote

WHO WILL BE FUNDING THE COURSE?

My employer

By submitting your details you agree to be contacted in order to respond to your enquiry

• Business Analysis
• Lean Six Sigma Certification

Share this course

Our biggest summer sale.

We cannot process your enquiry without contacting you, please tick to confirm your consent to us for contacting you about your enquiry.

By submitting your details you agree to be contacted in order to respond to your enquiry.

We may not have the course you’re looking for. If you enquire or give us a call on 01344203999 and speak to our training experts, we may still be able to help with your training requirements.

Or select from our popular topics

• ITIL® Certification
• Scrum Certification
• ISO 9001 Certification
• Change Management Certification
• Microsoft Azure Certification
• Microsoft Excel Courses
• Explore more courses

Press esc to close

Fill out your  contact details  below and our training experts will be in touch.

Fill out your   contact details   below

Thank you for your enquiry!

One of our training experts will be in touch shortly to go over your training requirements.

Back to Course Information

Fill out your contact details below so we can get in touch with you regarding your training requirements.

* WHO WILL BE FUNDING THE COURSE?

Preferred Contact Method

No preference

Back to course information

Fill out your  training details  below

Fill out your training details below so we have a better idea of what your training requirements are.

HOW MANY DELEGATES NEED TRAINING?

HOW DO YOU WANT THE COURSE DELIVERED?

Online Instructor-led

Online Self-paced

WHEN WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE THIS COURSE?

Next 2 - 4 months

WHAT IS YOUR REASON FOR ENQUIRING?

Looking for some information

Looking for a discount

I want to book but have questions

One of our training experts will be in touch shortly to go overy your training requirements.

Your privacy & cookies!

Like many websites we use cookies. We care about your data and experience, so to give you the best possible experience using our site, we store a very limited amount of your data. Continuing to use this site or clicking “Accept & close” means that you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more about our privacy policy and cookie policy cookie policy .

We use cookies that are essential for our site to work. Please visit our cookie policy for more information. To accept all cookies click 'Accept & close'.

The Science Of Writing: A Dive Into Scientific Report

Explore new discoveries! Delve into a scientific report and uncover groundbreaking research explained simply.

Scientific reports offer a detailed narrative of research endeavors, guiding readers through the methodology employed, the data collected, the analysis conducted, and the conclusions drawn. These reports are not just about documenting findings but also about communicating them effectively to fellow researchers, policymakers, and the public. By adhering to established formats and standards, scientists ensure that their work is accessible, transparent, and reproducible. In this article, we’ll explore the details of scientific reporting, from structuring the report to interpreting its significance and highlighting its role in improving scientific knowledge and fostering innovation.

Understanding Scientific Report 

A scientific report is a formal document that systematically presents the methods, results, and conclusions of a research study or experiment. It serves as a means of communicating scientific findings to a wider audience, including fellow researchers, academics, and professionals in the field. Structured in a specific format, typically including sections such as an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, and references , a scientific report aims to provide a clear and comprehensive account of the research process and outcomes. It embodies principles of objectivity, clarity, and adherence to established conventions of scientific writing, facilitating transparency, reproducibility, and the advancement of knowledge within a particular discipline or area of study.

How To Write A Scientific Report

Crafting a precise and impactful scientific report is essential for effectively communicating research findings with clarity and accuracy. Such reports document the process, progress, and outcomes of technical or scientific research, offering insights into methodology, findings, and often, recommendations and conclusions. Serving as a vital communication tool within the scientific community and beyond, these reports facilitate knowledge dissemination across various fields. 

To craft a scientific report, several key steps must be followed. Start by defining the research question and providing background information. Outline the research methodology, including materials, procedures, and data collection techniques. Present results using tables, figures, and graphs when necessary, and interpret findings in the discussion section, comparing them to existing literature and addressing limitations or implications. Conclude by summarizing key findings, their significance, and citing sources appropriately.

Writing Clear And Concise Prose

Clear and concise writing ensures that the message is easily understood without unnecessary complexity or ambiguity. When crafting prose for a scientific report, researchers should prioritize simplicity and clarity, avoiding overly technical language or convoluted sentences that may confuse or alienate readers. Simple language and concise statements are crucial for effectively communicating complex ideas within a scientific report. 

Organizational Tips

Organizing information begins with creating a structured outline that includes all the necessary sections of a scientific report, such as the introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Each section should be labeled and arranged logically to guide the reader through the research process. 

Within each section, information should be presented coherently, with subheadings used to break down complex topics. Visual aids like tables, figures, and graphs can be used to illustrate data and make it easier to understand. It’s also important to maintain consistency in formatting and citation style throughout the report to ensure professionalism and adherence to academic standards.

Here are some organizational tips for crafting a scientific report:

Outline the Structure: Before starting writing, outline the structure of your report. Identify key sections such as introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion.

Start with a Strong Introduction: Begin the report with a clear and concise introduction that outlines the research question, objectives, and the significance of the study.

Provide Detailed Methods: Describe the research methodology in detail, including the materials used, procedures followed, and data collection techniques employed.

Present Results Clearly: Organize your results logically and present them clearly and straightforwardly using tables, figures, and graphs where appropriate.

Discuss Findings: Interpret the results in the discussion section, comparing them to existing literature, addressing any limitations, and exploring the broader implications of your findings.

Conclude Succinctly: Summarize the main findings of your study in the conclusion, reiterating their significance and potential impact.

Use Subheadings and Transitions: Use subheadings to break up large sections of text and guide the reader through the report. Ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs and sections to maintain coherence.

Proofread and Edit: Before submitting your report, carefully proofread and edit for clarity, coherence, and accuracy. Check for any grammatical errors, inconsistencies, or typos.

Formatting And Citation Guidelines

In scientific reports, adherence to specific formatting styles, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, is essential for maintaining uniformity and professionalism. These styles dictate the layout of the document, including font size, margins, spacing, and the presentation of tables, figures, and equations. Additionally, accurate and proper citation of sources is imperative to acknowledge the contributions of others and avoid plagiarism. Researchers must follow established citation formats when referencing sources within the text and compiling a list of references at the end of the report.

Related articles:

• Everything You Need To Know About APA Formatting
• Chicago Style Citation Made Easy: Formatting and Examples
• A Writer’s Guide to MLA Format: How to Get It Right

Scientific Report Elements

The title page of a scientific report typically includes the title of the report, the authors’ names and affiliations, and often the date of submission. The title should convey the main focus of the research while accurately representing its content. The authors’ names and affiliations provide credit and context to the research, while the date indicates the timeline of the report’s completion.

Table of Contents

The table of contents provides a roadmap for the reader, outlining the report’s structure and indicating where each section begins. It lists the major sections and subsections along with their corresponding page numbers, enabling readers to navigate the document efficiently and locate specific information of interest.

The abstract is a concise summary of the entire scientific report, typically ranging from 150 to 250 words. It briefly describes the research objectives, methods, results, and conclusions, providing readers with a quick overview of the study’s key findings and significance. The abstract serves as a crucial entry point for readers to determine whether the report aligns with their interests and information needs.

Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for the research by providing background information, contextualizing the study within existing literature, and stating the research objectives or hypotheses. It outlines the rationale for the research, identifies gaps or unresolved questions in the literature, and establishes the significance of the study. The introduction aims to capture the reader’s interest and provide a clear understanding of the research context and purpose.

Materials and Methods (Experimental)

The materials and methods section provides a detailed description of the experimental procedures and methodologies employed in the research. It includes information on the materials, equipment, and instruments used and the specific steps taken to conduct the experiments or observations. This section should be written in a clear and precise way, enabling other researchers to replicate the study if desired.

The results section presents the findings of the research clearly and systematically. It typically includes tables, figures, graphs, or other visual aids to illustrate the data collected during the study. The results are often organized according to the research objectives or hypotheses and are accompanied by descriptive text that highlights key findings and trends observed in the data.

The discussion section interprets and analyzes the results presented in the previous section, placing them in the context of existing literature and theoretical frameworks. It explores the implications of the findings, discusses possible explanations for observed patterns or discrepancies, and addresses the significance and limitations of the research. The discussion aims to provide a deeper understanding of the research outcomes and stimulate further inquiry in the field.

The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the research and their implications, reiterating the significance of the study in light of the research objectives or hypotheses. It may also offer suggestions for future research directions or practical applications based on the findings. The conclusion provides closure to the report and reinforces the key takeaways for the reader.

The references section lists all sources cited within the scientific report, following a specific citation style such as APA, MLA, or Chicago. It provides readers with the necessary information to locate and verify the sources used in the research, thereby ensuring transparency and credibility. The references are typically arranged alphabetically by the authors’ last names and include full bibliographic details such as author names, publication titles, journal names, publication dates, and page numbers.

Find more tips here: Formatting Science Reports .

Ethical Considerations

Within the framework of a scientific report, ethical considerations encompass a range of principles and practices aimed at ensuring the ethical conduct of research. These include upholding honesty and accuracy in reporting findings, avoiding plagiarism and data fabrication, disclosing conflicts of interest, obtaining informed consent from participants, respecting the welfare and rights of human subjects and animals, managing data responsibly, and adhering to publication ethics. By prioritizing ethical considerations, researchers uphold the trustworthiness and credibility of their work, safeguard the welfare of research participants, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge ethically and responsibly.

Integrity And Transparency

Ethical scientific reporting hinges on the principles of integrity and transparency. Researchers must conduct their studies with unwavering honesty, ensuring that their methodologies, data collection processes, and interpretations are transparently presented. Transparency extends to disclosing any potential biases, limitations, or conflicts of interest that could influence the research outcomes. By upholding integrity and transparency, scientists foster trust within the scientific community and promote the reliability of their findings.

Scientific Reporting Pitfalls

Plagiarism, data fabrication, and conflicts of interest are ethical pitfalls that researchers must vigilantly avoid in scientific reporting. Plagiarism involves using someone else’s work, ideas, or words without proper acknowledgment, which undermines the originality and integrity of the research. Data fabrication refers to the deliberate manipulation or falsification of research data to support desired conclusions, compromising the accuracy and validity of the findings. 

Conflicts of interest arise when researchers have personal, financial, or professional interests that could unduly influence their research objectivity or reporting. Researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines and standards, actively preventing and addressing instances of plagiarism, data fabrication, and conflicts of interest. By upholding ethical principles, scientific reports maintain their credibility and contribute to the advancement of knowledge with integrity.

Navigating Data Analysis

Navigating data analysis in a scientific report involves the process of interpreting and making sense of the data collected during research. It encompasses various steps, including data cleaning, data exploration, statistical analysis, and drawing conclusions based on the findings. Researchers must choose appropriate statistical methods to analyze their data and ensure the accuracy and reliability of their results. 

Navigating data analysis also involves effectively communicating the findings through clear and concise presentation in the scientific report, often using tables, figures, and graphs to illustrate key patterns and trends. Ultimately, the goal of navigating data analysis is to derive meaningful insights from the data collected, contributing to the overall objectives of the research study.

Data Cleaning

Data cleaning is a crucial process in research methodology that involves identifying and rectifying errors, inconsistencies, and missing values within a dataset. By meticulously addressing duplicate entries, correcting errors and outliers, filling in missing data points, and standardizing formats and units, researchers ensure the accuracy and integrity of the dataset. This meticulous attention to detail minimizes the risk of bias and inaccuracies in subsequent analysis, resulting in more reliable and robust research findings.

Data Exploration

Data exploration, a foundational step in the data analysis process, entails the systematic examination of a dataset to uncover patterns, trends, and relationships. Through visual and statistical techniques such as scatter plots, histograms, and correlation matrices, researchers gain valuable insights into the structure and characteristics of the data. By identifying outliers, anomalies, and potential data quality issues, researchers can refine their research questions, formulate hypotheses, and guide subsequent analysis. Data exploration facilitates a deeper understanding of the dataset, enabling researchers to make informed decisions and derive meaningful insights that contribute to the research objectives.

Common Statistical Analysis

Scientific reports often rely on various statistical methods to analyze data and draw meaningful conclusions. These methods may include descriptive statistics to summarize data, inferential statistics to make inferences about populations based on sample data, and hypothesis testing to assess the significance of research findings. Understanding and selecting appropriate statistical techniques based on the research design and data characteristics are crucial for conducting rigorous data analysis.

Data Interpretation And Presentation

Once data analysis is complete, the next step is to interpret the results and present them clearly and informally within the scientific report. This involves examining patterns, trends, and relationships in the data to draw meaningful conclusions that address the research objectives or hypotheses. Data interpretation should be guided by statistical findings and supported by evidence from the research. Additionally, presenting the results effectively using tables, figures, graphs, and charts enhances the clarity and accessibility of the findings for readers. By effectively navigating data analysis, researchers can elucidate the significance of their findings and contribute valuable insights to their field of study within the scientific report.

Communicating Findings

In a scientific report, communicating findings is the section where the researcher presents the results and conclusions drawn from the study. This section typically follows the methods and results sections and interprets the data collected and analyzed. Below are the typical components of a communicating findings section:

Presentation of Results: This involves presenting the key findings of the study, often in the form of tables, graphs, charts, or other visual aids. Data should be organized and clearly labeled to facilitate understanding.

Interpretation of Results: After presenting the data, the researcher explains the significance of the findings. This may involve discussing patterns, trends, relationships, or differences observed in the data. The interpretation should be objective and supported by evidence from the results.

Discussion of Implications: The researcher discusses the broader implications of the findings within the context of the research question or hypothesis. This may involve relating the results to existing theories, discussing practical applications, or considering implications for future research.

Comparison with Previous Studies: If relevant, the researcher may compare their findings with those of previous studies. This can help contextualize the results and identify areas of agreement or divergence with existing literature.

Limitations: It’s important to acknowledge any limitations or constraints of the study that may have influenced the findings. This could include issues such as sample size, methodology, or measurement error.

Conclusion: The section typically concludes with a summary of the main findings and their significance. This may also include suggestions for future research directions based on the current findings.

Strategies For Diverse Audiences

Effectively communicating findings in a Scientific Report is essential for ensuring the research’s understanding and impact across diverse audiences. Strategies for diverse audiences include tailoring communication to fellow researchers by balancing technical detail with clarity and context, presenting findings to policymakers in a relevant and actionable manner to inform policy decisions, and translating complex scientific information for the general public using relatable language, analogies, and visual aids. By employing these strategies, researchers can maximize the accessibility and relevance of their findings, fostering broader understanding and engagement with their work.

Importance Of Clarity And Accessibility

The importance of clarity and accessibility in scientific reporting is twofold: clear and straightforward presentation of findings ensures accurate interpretation by readers, achieved through logical structuring, concise language, and avoidance of ambiguity; additionally, accessibility is enhanced by employing visuals, formatting techniques, and plain language summaries, facilitating comprehension for a diverse audience. These elements collectively break down complex information, making the report more digestible and readable for all readers.

Peer Review Process

Understanding the peer review process and effectively responding to reviewer feedback are integral components of ensuring the quality and credibility of research findings. 

Overview of Peer Review

The peer review process is a cornerstone of scientific publishing, where manuscripts undergo evaluation by independent experts in the field before publication. This rigorous evaluation ensures that the research meets high standards of quality, accuracy, and validity. Peer review typically involves several stages, including submission, assessment by reviewers, and revisions based on feedback. Reviewers evaluate the originality, significance, methodology, and clarity of the research, providing constructive feedback to authors to improve the manuscript.

Also read: Peer Review Process: Understanding The Pathway To Publication

Responding To Reviewer Feedback

Upon receiving feedback from reviewers, authors are tasked with addressing their comments and suggestions thoughtfully and thoroughly. This may involve revising the manuscript, clarifying methods or results, providing additional evidence or analysis, or addressing any concerns raised by reviewers. Authors should approach reviewer feedback with an open mind, considering each comment carefully and providing clear and detailed responses to demonstrate how they have addressed the reviewers’ concerns. Effective communication and collaboration between authors and reviewers are essential for ensuring that the final manuscript meets the standards of rigor and excellence expected in scientific publishing.

Science Figures, Graphical Abstracts, And Infographics For Your Research

Mind the Graph is a comprehensive platform that offers a range of tools and resources to assist scientists in effectively communicating their research findings. One of the key features of Mind the Graph is its provision of science figures, which allows researchers to create visually appealing and informative graphical representations of their data. These figures are essential for presenting complex scientific concepts and experimental results clearly and concisely. Mind the Graph offers graphical abstracts, enabling researchers to summarize their research findings in a visually engaging format that quickly captures the attention of readers. The platform provides access to a wide variety of customizable infographics, allowing scientists to visually communicate key information and concepts related to their research projects. Subscribe now and start using the tool for free for 7 days.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.

Sign Up for Free

Try the best infographic maker and promote your research with scientifically-accurate beautiful figures

no credit card required

Content tags

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

11.1 The Purpose of Research Writing

Learning objectives.

• Identify reasons to research writing projects.
• Outline the steps of the research writing process.

Why was the Great Wall of China built? What have scientists learned about the possibility of life on Mars? What roles did women play in the American Revolution? How does the human brain create, store, and retrieve memories? Who invented the game of football, and how has it changed over the years?

You may know the answers to these questions off the top of your head. If you are like most people, however, you find answers to tough questions like these by searching the Internet, visiting the library, or asking others for information. To put it simply, you perform research.

Whether you are a scientist, an artist, a paralegal, or a parent, you probably perform research in your everyday life. When your boss, your instructor, or a family member asks you a question that you do not know the answer to, you locate relevant information, analyze your findings, and share your results. Locating, analyzing, and sharing information are key steps in the research process, and in this chapter, you will learn more about each step. By developing your research writing skills, you will prepare yourself to answer any question no matter how challenging.

Reasons for Research

When you perform research, you are essentially trying to solve a mystery—you want to know how something works or why something happened. In other words, you want to answer a question that you (and other people) have about the world. This is one of the most basic reasons for performing research.

But the research process does not end when you have solved your mystery. Imagine what would happen if a detective collected enough evidence to solve a criminal case, but she never shared her solution with the authorities. Presenting what you have learned from research can be just as important as performing the research. Research results can be presented in a variety of ways, but one of the most popular—and effective—presentation forms is the research paper . A research paper presents an original thesis, or purpose statement, about a topic and develops that thesis with information gathered from a variety of sources.

If you are curious about the possibility of life on Mars, for example, you might choose to research the topic. What will you do, though, when your research is complete? You will need a way to put your thoughts together in a logical, coherent manner. You may want to use the facts you have learned to create a narrative or to support an argument. And you may want to show the results of your research to your friends, your teachers, or even the editors of magazines and journals. Writing a research paper is an ideal way to organize thoughts, craft narratives or make arguments based on research, and share your newfound knowledge with the world.

Write a paragraph about a time when you used research in your everyday life. Did you look for the cheapest way to travel from Houston to Denver? Did you search for a way to remove gum from the bottom of your shoe? In your paragraph, explain what you wanted to research, how you performed the research, and what you learned as a result.

Research Writing and the Academic Paper

No matter what field of study you are interested in, you will most likely be asked to write a research paper during your academic career. For example, a student in an art history course might write a research paper about an artist’s work. Similarly, a student in a psychology course might write a research paper about current findings in childhood development.

Having to write a research paper may feel intimidating at first. After all, researching and writing a long paper requires a lot of time, effort, and organization. However, writing a research paper can also be a great opportunity to explore a topic that is particularly interesting to you. The research process allows you to gain expertise on a topic of your choice, and the writing process helps you remember what you have learned and understand it on a deeper level.

Research Writing at Work

Knowing how to write a good research paper is a valuable skill that will serve you well throughout your career. Whether you are developing a new product, studying the best way to perform a procedure, or learning about challenges and opportunities in your field of employment, you will use research techniques to guide your exploration. You may even need to create a written report of your findings. And because effective communication is essential to any company, employers seek to hire people who can write clearly and professionally.

Writing at Work

Take a few minutes to think about each of the following careers. How might each of these professionals use researching and research writing skills on the job?

• Medical laboratory technician
• Small business owner
• Information technology professional
• Freelance magazine writer

A medical laboratory technician or information technology professional might do research to learn about the latest technological developments in either of these fields. A small business owner might conduct research to learn about the latest trends in his or her industry. A freelance magazine writer may need to research a given topic to write an informed, up-to-date article.

Think about the job of your dreams. How might you use research writing skills to perform that job? Create a list of ways in which strong researching, organizing, writing, and critical thinking skills could help you succeed at your dream job. How might these skills help you obtain that job?

Steps of the Research Writing Process

How does a research paper grow from a folder of brainstormed notes to a polished final draft? No two projects are identical, but most projects follow a series of six basic steps.

These are the steps in the research writing process:

• Choose a topic.
• Plan and schedule time to research and write.
• Conduct research.
• Organize research and ideas.
• Draft your paper.
• Revise and edit your paper.

Each of these steps will be discussed in more detail later in this chapter. For now, though, we will take a brief look at what each step involves.

Step 1: Choosing a Topic

As you may recall from Chapter 8 “The Writing Process: How Do I Begin?” , to narrow the focus of your topic, you may try freewriting exercises, such as brainstorming. You may also need to ask a specific research question —a broad, open-ended question that will guide your research—as well as propose a possible answer, or a working thesis . You may use your research question and your working thesis to create a research proposal . In a research proposal, you present your main research question, any related subquestions you plan to explore, and your working thesis.

Step 2: Planning and Scheduling

Before you start researching your topic, take time to plan your researching and writing schedule. Research projects can take days, weeks, or even months to complete. Creating a schedule is a good way to ensure that you do not end up being overwhelmed by all the work you have to do as the deadline approaches.

During this step of the process, it is also a good idea to plan the resources and organizational tools you will use to keep yourself on track throughout the project. Flowcharts, calendars, and checklists can all help you stick to your schedule. See Chapter 11 “Writing from Research: What Will I Learn?” , Section 11.2 “Steps in Developing a Research Proposal” for an example of a research schedule.

Step 3: Conducting Research

When going about your research, you will likely use a variety of sources—anything from books and periodicals to video presentations and in-person interviews.

Your sources will include both primary sources and secondary sources . Primary sources provide firsthand information or raw data. For example, surveys, in-person interviews, and historical documents are primary sources. Secondary sources, such as biographies, literary reviews, or magazine articles, include some analysis or interpretation of the information presented. As you conduct research, you will take detailed, careful notes about your discoveries. You will also evaluate the reliability of each source you find.

Step 4: Organizing Research and the Writer’s Ideas

When your research is complete, you will organize your findings and decide which sources to cite in your paper. You will also have an opportunity to evaluate the evidence you have collected and determine whether it supports your thesis, or the focus of your paper. You may decide to adjust your thesis or conduct additional research to ensure that your thesis is well supported.

Remember, your working thesis is not set in stone. You can and should change your working thesis throughout the research writing process if the evidence you find does not support your original thesis. Never try to force evidence to fit your argument. For example, your working thesis is “Mars cannot support life-forms.” Yet, a week into researching your topic, you find an article in the New York Times detailing new findings of bacteria under the Martian surface. Instead of trying to argue that bacteria are not life forms, you might instead alter your thesis to “Mars cannot support complex life-forms.”

Step 5: Drafting Your Paper

Now you are ready to combine your research findings with your critical analysis of the results in a rough draft. You will incorporate source materials into your paper and discuss each source thoughtfully in relation to your thesis or purpose statement.

When you cite your reference sources, it is important to pay close attention to standard conventions for citing sources in order to avoid plagiarism , or the practice of using someone else’s words without acknowledging the source. Later in this chapter, you will learn how to incorporate sources in your paper and avoid some of the most common pitfalls of attributing information.

Step 6: Revising and Editing Your Paper

In the final step of the research writing process, you will revise and polish your paper. You might reorganize your paper’s structure or revise for unity and cohesion, ensuring that each element in your paper flows into the next logically and naturally. You will also make sure that your paper uses an appropriate and consistent tone.

Once you feel confident in the strength of your writing, you will edit your paper for proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and formatting. When you complete this final step, you will have transformed a simple idea or question into a thoroughly researched and well-written paper you can be proud of!

Review the steps of the research writing process. Then answer the questions on your own sheet of paper.

• In which steps of the research writing process are you allowed to change your thesis?
• In step 2, which types of information should you include in your project schedule?
• What might happen if you eliminated step 4 from the research writing process?

Key Takeaways

• People undertake research projects throughout their academic and professional careers in order to answer specific questions, share their findings with others, increase their understanding of challenging topics, and strengthen their researching, writing, and analytical skills.
• The research writing process generally comprises six steps: choosing a topic, scheduling and planning time for research and writing, conducting research, organizing research and ideas, drafting a paper, and revising and editing the paper.

Writing for Success Copyright © 2015 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Research Reports: Definition and How to Write Them

Reports are usually spread across a vast horizon of topics but are focused on communicating information about a particular topic and a niche target market. The primary motive of research reports is to convey integral details about a study for marketers to consider while designing new strategies.

Certain events, facts, and other information based on incidents need to be relayed to the people in charge, and creating research reports is the most effective communication tool. Ideal research reports are extremely accurate in the offered information with a clear objective and conclusion. These reports should have a clean and structured format to relay information effectively.

What are Research Reports?

Research reports are recorded data prepared by researchers or statisticians after analyzing the information gathered by conducting organized research, typically in the form of surveys or qualitative methods .

A research report is a reliable source to recount details about a conducted research. It is most often considered to be a true testimony of all the work done to garner specificities of research.

The various sections of a research report are:

• Background/Introduction
• Implemented Methods
• Results based on Analysis
• Deliberation

Learn more: Quantitative Research

Components of Research Reports

Research is imperative for launching a new product/service or a new feature. The markets today are extremely volatile and competitive due to new entrants every day who may or may not provide effective products. An organization needs to make the right decisions at the right time to be relevant in such a market with updated products that suffice customer demands.

The details of a research report may change with the purpose of research but the main components of a report will remain constant. The research approach of the market researcher also influences the style of writing reports. Here are seven main components of a productive research report:

• Research Report Summary: The entire objective along with the overview of research are to be included in a summary which is a couple of paragraphs in length. All the multiple components of the research are explained in brief under the report summary.  It should be interesting enough to capture all the key elements of the report.
• Research Introduction: There always is a primary goal that the researcher is trying to achieve through a report. In the introduction section, he/she can cover answers related to this goal and establish a thesis which will be included to strive and answer it in detail.  This section should answer an integral question: “What is the current situation of the goal?”.  After the research design was conducted, did the organization conclude the goal successfully or they are still a work in progress –  provide such details in the introduction part of the research report.
• Research Methodology: This is the most important section of the report where all the important information lies. The readers can gain data for the topic along with analyzing the quality of provided content and the research can also be approved by other market researchers . Thus, this section needs to be highly informative with each aspect of research discussed in detail.  Information needs to be expressed in chronological order according to its priority and importance. Researchers should include references in case they gained information from existing techniques.
• Research Results: A short description of the results along with calculations conducted to achieve the goal will form this section of results. Usually, the exposition after data analysis is carried out in the discussion part of the report.

Learn more: Quantitative Data

• Research Discussion: The results are discussed in extreme detail in this section along with a comparative analysis of reports that could probably exist in the same domain. Any abnormality uncovered during research will be deliberated in the discussion section.  While writing research reports, the researcher will have to connect the dots on how the results will be applicable in the real world.
• Research References and Conclusion: Conclude all the research findings along with mentioning each and every author, article or any content piece from where references were taken.

Learn more: Qualitative Observation

15 Tips for Writing Research Reports

Writing research reports in the manner can lead to all the efforts going down the drain. Here are 15 tips for writing impactful research reports:

• Prepare the context before starting to write and start from the basics:  This was always taught to us in school – be well-prepared before taking a plunge into new topics. The order of survey questions might not be the ideal or most effective order for writing research reports. The idea is to start with a broader topic and work towards a more specific one and focus on a conclusion or support, which a research should support with the facts.  The most difficult thing to do in reporting, without a doubt is to start. Start with the title, the introduction, then document the first discoveries and continue from that. Once the marketers have the information well documented, they can write a general conclusion.
• Keep the target audience in mind while selecting a format that is clear, logical and obvious to them:  Will the research reports be presented to decision makers or other researchers? What are the general perceptions around that topic? This requires more care and diligence. A researcher will need a significant amount of information to start writing the research report. Be consistent with the wording, the numbering of the annexes and so on. Follow the approved format of the company for the delivery of research reports and demonstrate the integrity of the project with the objectives of the company.
• Have a clear research objective: A researcher should read the entire proposal again, and make sure that the data they provide contributes to the objectives that were raised from the beginning. Remember that speculations are for conversations, not for research reports, if a researcher speculates, they directly question their own research.
• Establish a working model:  Each study must have an internal logic, which will have to be established in the report and in the evidence. The researchers’ worst nightmare is to be required to write research reports and realize that key questions were not included.

Learn more: Quantitative Observation

• Gather all the information about the research topic. Who are the competitors of our customers? Talk to other researchers who have studied the subject of research, know the language of the industry. Misuse of the terms can discourage the readers of research reports from reading further.
• Read aloud while writing. While reading the report, if the researcher hears something inappropriate, for example, if they stumble over the words when reading them, surely the reader will too. If the researcher can’t put an idea in a single sentence, then it is very long and they must change it so that the idea is clear to everyone.
• Check grammar and spelling. Without a doubt, good practices help to understand the report. Use verbs in the present tense. Consider using the present tense, which makes the results sound more immediate. Find new words and other ways of saying things. Have fun with the language whenever possible.
• Discuss only the discoveries that are significant. If some data are not really significant, do not mention them. Remember that not everything is truly important or essential within research reports.

Learn more: Qualitative Data

• Try and stick to the survey questions. For example, do not say that the people surveyed “were worried” about an research issue , when there are different degrees of concern.
• The graphs must be clear enough so that they understand themselves. Do not let graphs lead the reader to make mistakes: give them a title, include the indications, the size of the sample, and the correct wording of the question.
• Be clear with messages. A researcher should always write every section of the report with an accuracy of details and language.
• Be creative with titles – Particularly in segmentation studies choose names “that give life to research”. Such names can survive for a long time after the initial investigation.
• Create an effective conclusion: The conclusion in the research reports is the most difficult to write, but it is an incredible opportunity to excel. Make a precise summary. Sometimes it helps to start the conclusion with something specific, then it describes the most important part of the study, and finally, it provides the implications of the conclusions.
• Get a couple more pair of eyes to read the report. Writers have trouble detecting their own mistakes. But they are responsible for what is presented. Ensure it has been approved by colleagues or friends before sending the find draft out.

Learn more: Market Research and Analysis

MORE LIKE THIS

User Behavior: What it is, How to Understand, Track & Uses

Sep 24, 2024

Mass Personalization is not Personalization! — Tuesday CX Thoughts

Change Management Questions: How to Design & Ask Questions

Sep 23, 2024

Top 5 Change Management Models to Transform Your Organization

Sep 20, 2024

Other categories

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
• Uncategorized
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Can Commun Dis Rep
• v.42(9); 2016 Sep 1

Scientific Writing

A reporting guide for qualitative studies.

Qualitative studies provide insight into complex phenomena. Unlike measurement-based studies which typically quantify what happens under experimental conditions, qualitative studies often help explain behaviors or perceptions under actual circumstances. Qualitative studies in the field of communicable diseases can be used to provide insight into why people choose high-risk behaviours and to identify the factors that influence their decisions. For example, a qualitative study may address why healthcare practitioners do not practice adequate hand hygiene and whether patients might help by reminding them to do so. The results can be surprising. For example, a recent study identified that inpatients in one hospital who were most dissatisfied with the care they received were also the least likely to ask healthcare professionals if they had washed their hands ( 1 ). Furthermore, the study identified that the decision not to pose this question was linked to patient awareness that staff satisfaction was low.

Qualitative research analyzes data from direct field observations, in-depth, open-ended interviews and written documents. Inductive analyses yield patterns and themes that generate hypotheses and offer a basis for future research. Although qualitative studies do not create generalizable evidence, well-reported studies provide enough information for readers to assess the applicability or transferability of findings to their own context ( 2 ).

There are a variety of checklists about how to report qualitative studies ( 3 - 6 ). The Canada Communicable Disease Report (CCDR) has developed a 24-item checklist that synthesizes these including the COREQ checklist noted on the EQUATOR Network ( 6 ). The CCDR checklist identifies the importance of describing how data was gathered and summarized, what trends were determined, exploring corroborative findings, offering alternative explanations and identifying possible next steps or further areas of inquiry ( Table 1 ).

Abbreviation: No., Number

Reports of qualitative studies are usually around 2,500 words in length—excluding the abstract, tables and references. As with all submissions, check CCDR’s Information for authors , published at the beginning of each volume in January of each year for general manuscript preparation and submission requirements ( 7 ).

What is Report Writing? Parts, Types, Structure, Process

• Post last modified: 4 June 2023
• Reading time: 30 mins read
• Post category: Business Communication

• What is Report Writing?

Report writing is a formal style of presenting objective facts and information. There can be various types of reports, such as academic reports, science reports, business reports, technical reports, and news reports. A report can be verbal or written. However, a written report is more formal than a verbal report.

Table of Content

• 1 What is Report Writing?
• 2 Report Writing Definition
• 3 Report Writing Advantage
• 4.1 Introduction
• 4.2 Background
• 4.3 Findings
• 4.4 Conclusions
• 4.5 Recommendations
• 5.1 Informational reports
• 5.2 Analytical reports
• 5.3 News reports
• 6.2 Remaining details
• 6.3 Informational news report
• 6.4 Analytical news report
• 6.5 Additional details
• 6.6 Concluding sentence
• 7.1 Identify
• 7.2 Research
• 7.3 Organise
• 8 Feasibility Reports
• 9.1 Cover letter
• 9.2 Executive summary
• 9.3 Proposal
• 9.4 Pricing information
• 9.5 Terms and conditions

Report Writing Definition

Report writing is the process of organizing and presenting information in a clear, concise, and objective manner for a specific audience. It involves gathering data, analyzing it, and presenting it in a format that is easy to understand and relevant to the topic at hand. – The University of Wisconsin Writing Center

Report writing is the art of communicating information that has been acquired through research or investigation in a formal, structured manner. It involves synthesizing information, drawing conclusions, and making recommendations based on the findings. – The American Management Association

Report writing is the process of creating a document that provides information, analysis, and recommendations on a particular topic or issue. It requires the ability to organize and present data in a logical and meaningful way, as well as to convey complex ideas in a clear and concise manner. – The International Business Communication Standards (IBCS)

Report Writing Advantage

A written report also provides the following advantages:

• A written report presents a formal record of a transaction, which is not possible in a verbal report.
• A written report conveys a message without any distortion. On the other hand, a message can be easily misrepresented in a verbal report.
• A written report is more convenient for lengthy and distant communication.
• A written report requires a reader to think before responding to a message.
• Facts, figures and statistical data can be better represented graphically in a written report.

However, writing a report is not as easy as drafting a formal e-mail. A report is a brief, precise document. It is written for a specific audience with some specific objective. To write a report, you need to first thoroughly understand the purpose of report writing, then research information from various sources, verify the validity of information, analyse information, and then present findings or results. These findings must be reported objectively without personal biases.

A well-written report must have an effective objective analysis. Based on the analysis, you can recommend possible courses of action for the future. However, it is up to the report reader to accept the recommendations.

Therefore, while report writing, you must pay attention to why you are writing the report and who has asked you to write the report. This will help you investigate the information appropriately.

Parts of a Report

Following are the main sections of a formal report :

Introduction

Conclusions, recommendations.

This section indicates the purpose of the report, who has ordered the report, how the data is collected, and whether any recommendations are provided. In addition, the introduction section may also provide information on who has written the report and the date on which it is submitted.

This section provides the background of a problem or a situation on which the report is written. In case the report is too lengthy, then instead of introduction, an executive summary should be written.

The purpose of an executive summary is to enable top executives and managers to get a quick snapshot of a long report without reading the entire report. Therefore, the executive summary comes before introduction. Of course, then there would be no background section.

This is the longest section of a report, which is written after the investigation is over. This section presents factual information without any interpretation or suggestions.

Each finding is summarised as a conclusion in this section. In the above sample report, there are four conclusions based on the summary of each paragraph in the findings section. These conclusions are listed numerically in the same order as the corresponding findings.

The final section provides a numbered list of recommendations, which are based on the list of the conclusion. Each recommendation uses the verb should. This is because the writer is simply giving suggestions and not making a decision. Therefore, the verb should is used instead of the verb will. However, there are exceptions:

• To give a strong recommendation: Use the verb must. For example, ‘The team managers must ensure that the break hours are not shortened.’
• To give a weak recommendation: Use the verb could. For example, ‘Having a coffee dispenser in the facility could boost the staff morale.’

Types of Reports

Reports exist in our academics and workplaces in so many forms that we may not even be aware of them. For example, a student submits a laboratory report to communicate the methods and results of scientific experiments conducted in a lab.

Academicians and business people use research reports to view scientific studies of an issue or a problem. Policy-makers read field study reports to read about the ground situation from branch offices and manufacturing plants. Similarly, there are progress reports, technical reports, functional reports, case studies, etc.

All these reports share the attributes, principles, and format of report writing, which are described above. These reports can be organised into three groups:

Informational reports

Analytical reports, news reports.

An informational report is used to objectively present information without any analysis. Examples of informational reports include the First Information Report (FIR), annual reports, monthly financial reports, or employee attrition reports. These reports only report the facts as they are.

For example, the police write an FIR to record details about a cognisable offence, such as personal details of the complainant/informant, place, date and time of occurrence, offence, description of the accused, witnesses, and complaint.

Similarly, a company presents an annual report to its shareholders to present details of its business activities and finances of the previous financial year. An informational report presents objective facts without analysing the reasons and conditions behind the reported situation.

For example, if someone wants to study information on a field trip, then he can ask for a site visit report. Similarly, if a manager wants to view the feedback of a training programme, then he can ask for the training feedback report from the trainer. If the head of a department wants to get an update on the different projects in his department, he can ask for progress reports from different project managers.

An analytical report evaluates a problem or an issue and presents the outcomes of analysis to explain the causes of the problem, demonstrate relationships, or make recommendations.

For example, a scientific or market research report studies a problem scientifically by developing a hypothesis, gathering data, analysing data, and presenting findings and conclusions.

Similarly, a feasibility analysis report studies a problem and predicts whether the current solution or alternatives will be practical or will produce the desired outcome. Whenever you need to make a critical decision, then an analytical report is prepared. These reports help the decision-maker(s) analyse the prevailing situation.

For example, a company wants to decide where to open a branch office in a particular area. In this situation, an analytical report can evaluate the details of the property, such as infrastructure, land cost, competitive stores, etc., and then recommend the best site from the available options.

If you are working as or aspire to be a journalist, then you may need to write a press report. A press report is a newsworthy article in a newspaper, magazine or website. It is different from the press release by companies. A press release is an official statement of a company on an important subject or event. A press release generally focuses on one particular subject, such as a milestone, a launch, an anniversary, etc.

On the other hand, a press report discusses the subject in detail. A press release is a marketing tool used by companies to keep the general public and the media updated about its newsworthy occasions. It helps build a company’s visibility in the minds of its customers and community at large.

A press release is generally prepared by a company’s marketing or Public Relations (PR) team, whereas a press report is written by an independent journalist. Therefore, a press report presents more objective information than a press release, which is a company’s promotional mouthpiece. Just like informational and analytical reports, a press report requires considerable research on a subject before it is written credibly.

The author must ask the 5 Ws and 1 H – who, what, where, why, when, and how. Questions arise in the following manner:

• What happened?
• Where did it happen?
• When did it happen?
• Who was involved?
• Why did it happen?
• How did it happen?

After finding the answers, he must note down all the relevant facts that must be mentioned in the news report. These facts can be organised into the following three groups:

• Vital and interesting facts
• Not vital but interesting facts
• Not vital, not interesting, but related facts

By organising information into the above groups, the author will be able to include all the relevant facts into the news report. The facts must be specific. If there are gaps in the story and the related information is not available, then questions can be marked against them so that these can be researched further.

Next, the author must decide the type of news report he wants to write – informational or analytical. The former will provide objective and straightforward information, whereas the latter will also provide the author’s opinion on the subject.

After determining the type of news report to write, the author must create an outline or structure of the report. The most common structure is an inverted triangle, where the most important information is at the top.

A news report must provide the information that the readers want as soon as possible. If the news report is for a newspaper, then the most important news must be above the “fold”. The “fold” is the crease in the newspaper when it is folded in half. All the engaging stories are above the fold. Similarly, on a website, the most important information is at the top of the screen before one has to scroll down.

A news report must be written according to the audience. The author should ask the 5Ws with respect to the audience reaction, such as:

• Who is the audience?
• Where is the audience?
• What does the audience want to read?
• Why do they want to read it?
• When will they read it?

Structure of News Report

Finally, the structure of a news report is as follows:

Remaining details

Informational news report, analytical news report, additional details, concluding sentence.

The leading sentence of a news report is the most important section. It should tell what the news report is all about, why it is important, and what information the rest of the news report provides.

These provide the basic information of what happened, where it happened, when it happened, who was involved, and why it was remarkable.

In this report, the remaining details provide more information about the newsworthy item.

In this report, the remaining details also provide the opinion of the author.

These details help the reader learn more about the newsworthy item, such as additional facts about the subject, contact information, or interview quotes. These details comprise transitional elements that help build the flow of information. In an analytical report, these can also include counter-arguments and their authors.

The news report should end with a concluding sentence, which repeats the leading statement or a statement mentioning future developments.

Report Writing Process

This process will ensure that your report is accurate, clear, comprehensive and credible.

Before writing a report, identify the following parameters:

• Issue or problem : Identify the issue or problem to analyse.
• Audience : Identify who the audience is. Find out their background information. Determine why they would want to read the report.
• Purpose : Determine the purpose for which the report will be used.
• Scope and limitations : Identify the scope of the report. Determine the limitations of report writing.
• Expectations : Determine expectations regarding the format or structure of the report. Identify the models available for report writing. Determine whether there is a style guide and/or a marketing guide.

To research the facts or information for report writing:

• Plan : Make a draft plan on how to analyse the problem and present the objective of the report.
• Collect data: Collect information based on the purpose of the report.
• Analyse : Finally, analyse and evaluate the collected information.

After gathering and analysing the required information, organise it as follows:

• Main points : Identify the main points of the report. These main points should be supported by adequate evidence.
• Additional information : Identify the supporting information that analyses and confirms the main points. This information should be placed in appendices.
• Logical structure : Organise the entire information into a logical structure to help the readers easily navigate to the desired part of the report.
• Write : After deciding the logical structure of the report, fill in the elements of the report, including executive summary, main body, introduction and conclusion.
• Revise : Finally, verify if it is appropriate for the problem, audience, and purpose.

Feasibility Reports

A feasibility report is a written document that analyses the proposed solution and examines whether it is feasible considering various types of constraints such as financial, social, environmental, social, technical, and legal that can make it impossible for a solution to be opted.

Feasibility reports assess the practicality of following a particular course of action for a project. It advises whether it will be feasible to opt for a particular course of action or will this proposal or plan work? These are written internal reports that advise on consolidating departments or to organise a wellness programme for employees or to outsource company’s accounting or social media or to move the manufacturing unit to a new location.

Some companies hire a professional consultant to write feasibility reports in order to investigate a problem. These reports help in deciding whether to proceed or reject the proposed option.

• Overview of the Project
• Objectives of the Project
• The Need for the Project
• Overview of Existing Systems and Technologies
• Scope of the Project
• Deliverables
• Financial Feasibility
• Technical Feasibility
• Resource and Time Feasibility
• Risk Feasibility
• Social/Legal Feasibility
• Considerations

Proposal Writing

A business proposal is defined as a written document from a seller that offers a particular service or product to a prospective buyer. Business proposals are important in scenarios where a buyer might consider multiple prices in a transaction.

A good business proposal considers the buyer’s requirements and puts forth the seller’s proposal in a way that favours the seller’s products and services, and persuades the buyer about the offer. A business proposal is a critical document as it determines the difference between success and failure in a venture. Business proposals can be:

• Solicited : These are requested by clients themselves or submitted in response to an advertisement published by the client. Solicited business proposals generally have a better chance of success since they are tailored to the requirements of the person receiving the proposal.
• Unsolicited : These are submitted to potential clients even though they did not request for one. These are non-specific proposals and have no direct connection to the client’s requirements. Sellers use them to market a product or service to a prospective customer.

Because proposals are time-consuming, it is the best to start with available templates if possible. You will save a lot of time if you start with a proposal template that matches what you need and then customise it according to your requirements.

A business proposal includes various sections which are defined as follows:

Cover letter

Executive summary, pricing information, terms and conditions.

In the other article, you studied writing cover letters for a job application. A business proposal also needs a cover letter because a good cover letter will stimulate interest in the proposal. Make sure to highlight your positives and personalise them to the client to whom you are sending the business proposal.

This is where you give the client a ‘problem statement’ to help him identify the challenges and requirements in his business. This is because in order to persuade the client to do business with you, you first need to make sure that the client realises they have those needs. Then you briefly state how you will be able to help them meet those requirements.

The proposal is the part where you offer a detailed solution to the challenges and needs of the prospective client. This is the main reason for submitting a business proposal so it should be as detailed as possible, addressing all the needs of the client.

You should explain to the client all services that you can provide. You should tailor your list of services to suit the particular client’s needs but include other services that you may provide. Also include an estimated project schedule and time frame.

Most buyers consider the price of services before offering a contract. Thus, getting accurate pricing information is crucial. However, two points must be kept in mind. One it is important to be exact with the pricing and the second is to never negotiate below what you think the project is worth.

For smaller projects, a ‘fee summary’ will do the job. But a ‘fee schedule’ is needed for bigger projects, where payments need to be broken down to specific milestones.

It is in your interest to get legal counsel to review the proposal as this will cover your business against claims.

Business Communication Notes

( Click on Topic to Read )

• What is Business Communication?
• What is Communication?
• Types of Communication
• 7 C of Communication

Barriers To Business Communication

• Oral Communication

Types Of Non Verbal Communication

• What is Written Communication?
• What are Soft Skills?
• Interpersonal vs Intrapersonal communication
• Barriers to Communication

Importance of Communication Skills

• Listening in Communication
• Causes of Miscommunication
• What is Johari Window?
• What is Presentation?

Communication Styles

• Channels of Communication

Hofstede’s Dimensions of Cultural Differences and Benett’s Stages of Intercultural Sensitivity

Organisational communication.

• Horizontal C ommunication
• Grapevine Communication
• Downward Communication
• Verbal Communication Skills
• Upward Communication
• Flow of Communication
• What is Emotional Intelligence?
• What is Public Speaking?
• Upward vs Downward Communication
• Internal vs External Communication
• What is Group Discussion?
• What is Interview?
• What is Negotiation?
• What is Digital Communication?
• What is Letter Writing?
• Resume and Covering Letter
• What is Business Meeting?
• What is Public Relations?
• What Is Market Segmentation?
• What Is Marketing Mix?
• Marketing Concept
• Marketing Management Process
• What Is Marketing Environment?
• What Is Consumer Behaviour?
• Business Buyer Behaviour
• Demand Forecasting
• 7 Stages Of New Product Development
• Methods Of Pricing
• What Is Public Relations?
• What Is Marketing Management?
• What Is Sales Promotion?
• Types Of Sales Promotion
• Techniques Of Sales Promotion
• What Is Personal Selling?
• What Is Advertising?
• Market Entry Strategy
• What Is Marketing Planning?
• Segmentation Targeting And Positioning
• Brand Building Process
• Kotler Five Product Level Model
• Classification Of Products
• Types Of Logistics
• What Is Consumer Research?
• What Is DAGMAR?
• Consumer Behaviour Models
• What Is Green Marketing?
• What Is Electronic Commerce?
• Agricultural Cooperative Marketing
• What Is Marketing Control?
• What Is Marketing Communication?
• What Is Pricing?
• Models Of Communication
• What is Sales Management?
• Objectives of Sales Management
• Responsibilities and Skills of Sales Manager
• Theories of Personal Selling
• What is Sales Forecasting?
• Methods of Sales Forecasting
• Purpose of Sales Budgeting
• Methods of Sales Budgeting
• Types of Sales Budgeting
• Sales Budgeting Process
• What is Sales Quotas?
• What is Selling by Objectives (SBO) ?
• What is Sales Organisation?
• Types of Sales Force Structure
• Recruiting and Selecting Sales Personnel
• Training and Development of Salesforce
• Compensating the Sales Force
• Time and Territory Management
• What Is Logistics?
• What Is Logistics System?
• Technologies in Logistics
• What Is Distribution Management?
• What Is Marketing Intermediaries?
• Conventional Distribution System
• Functions of Distribution Channels
• What is Channel Design?
• Types of Wholesalers and Retailers
• What is Vertical Marketing Systems?
• What i s Marketing?
• What i s A BCG Matrix?
• 5 M’S Of Advertising
• What i s Direct Marketing?
• Marketing Mix For Services
• What Market Intelligence System?
• What i s Trade Union?
• What Is International Marketing?
• World Trade Organization (WTO)
• What i s International Marketing Research?
• What is Exporting?
• What is Licensing?
• What is Franchising?
• What is Joint Venture?
• What is Turnkey Projects?
• What is Management Contracts?
• What is Foreign Direct Investment?
• Factors That Influence Entry Mode Choice In Foreign Markets
• What is Price Escalations?
• What is Transfer Pricing?
• Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC)
• What is Promotion Mix?
• Factors Affecting Promotion Mix
• Functions & Role Of Advertising
• What is Database Marketing?
• What is Advertising Budget?
• What is Advertising Agency?
• What is Market Intelligence?
• What is Industrial Marketing?
• What is Customer Value
• What is Consumer Behaviour?
• What Is Personality?
• What Is Perception?
• What Is Learning?
• What Is Attitude?
• What Is Motivation?
• Consumer Imagery
• Consumer Attitude Formation
• What Is Culture?
• Consumer Decision Making Process
• Applications of Consumer Behaviour in Marketing
• Motivational Research
• Theoretical Approaches to Study of Consumer Behaviour
• Consumer Involvement
• Consumer Lifestyle
• Theories of Personality
• Outlet Selection
• Organizational Buying Behaviour
• Reference Groups
• Consumer Protection Act, 1986
• Diffusion of Innovation
• Opinion Leaders
• What is Business Law?
• Indian Contract Act 1872
• Essential Elements of a Valid Contract
• Types of Contract
• What is Discharge of Contract?
• Performance of Contract
• Sales of Goods Act 1930
• Goods & Price: Contract of Sale
• Conditions and Warranties
• Doctrine of Caveat Emptor
• Transfer of Property
• Rights of Unpaid Seller
• Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
• Types of Negotiable Instruments
• Types of Endorsement
• What is Promissory Note?
• What is Cheque?
• What is Crossing of Cheque?
• What is Bill of Exchange?
• What is Offer?
• Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008
• Memorandum of Association
• Articles of Association
• What is Director?
• Trade Unions Act, 1926
• Industrial Disputes Act 1947
• Employee State Insurance Act 1948
• Payment of Wages Act 1936
• Payment of Bonus Act 1965
• Labour Law in India
• What is Brand Management?
• 4 Steps of Strategic Brand Management Process
• Customer Based Brand Equity
• What is Brand Equity?

You Might Also Like

What is interview types, questions, do’s and don’ts, preparing.

What is Public Relations? Definition, Tools, Function, Advantages, Process

What is Oral Communication? Advantages, Disadvantages, Imp

What is Written Communication? Advantages, Disadvantages

What is a Presentation? Objectives, Elements, Important skills, Four Ps

What are Soft Skills? Types, Importance, How to Develop

Leave a reply cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

World's Best Online Courses at One Place

We’ve spent the time in finding, so you can spend your time in learning

Digital Marketing

Personal Growth

Development

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Academic writing

What Is Academic Writing? | Dos and Don’ts for Students

Academic writing is a formal style of writing used in universities and scholarly publications. You’ll encounter it in journal articles and books on academic topics, and you’ll be expected to write your essays , research papers , and dissertation in academic style.

Academic writing follows the same writing process as other types of texts, but it has specific conventions in terms of content, structure and style.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Types of academic writing, academic writing is…, academic writing is not…, useful tools for academic writing, academic writing checklist.

Academics mostly write texts intended for publication, such as journal articles, reports, books, and chapters in edited collections. For students, the most common types of academic writing assignments are listed below.

Different fields of study have different priorities in terms of the writing they produce. For example, in scientific writing it’s crucial to clearly and accurately report methods and results; in the humanities, the focus is on constructing convincing arguments through the use of textual evidence. However, most academic writing shares certain key principles intended to help convey information as effectively as possible.

Whether your goal is to pass your degree, apply to graduate school , or build an academic career, effective writing is an essential skill.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Formal and unbiased

Academic writing aims to convey information in an impartial way. The goal is to base arguments on the evidence under consideration, not the author’s preconceptions. All claims should be supported with relevant evidence, not just asserted.

To avoid bias, it’s important to represent the work of other researchers and the results of your own research fairly and accurately. This means clearly outlining your methodology  and being honest about the limitations of your research.

The formal style used in academic writing ensures that research is presented consistently across different texts, so that studies can be objectively assessed and compared with other research.

Because of this, it’s important to strike the right tone with your language choices. Avoid informal language , including slang, contractions , clichés, and conversational phrases:

• Also , a lot of the findings are a little unreliable.
• Moreover , many of the findings are somewhat unreliable.

Clear and precise

It’s important to use clear and precise language to ensure that your reader knows exactly what you mean. This means being as specific as possible and avoiding vague language :

• People have been interested in this thing for a long time .
• Researchers have been interested in this phenomenon for at least 10 years .

Avoid hedging your claims with words like “perhaps,” as this can give the impression that you lack confidence in your arguments. Reflect on your word choice to ensure it accurately and directly conveys your meaning:

• This could perhaps suggest that…
• This suggests that…

Specialist language or jargon is common and often necessary in academic writing, which generally targets an audience of other academics in related fields.

However, jargon should be used to make your writing more concise and accurate, not to make it more complicated. A specialist term should be used when:

• It conveys information more precisely than a comparable non-specialist term.
• Your reader is likely to be familiar with the term.
• The term is commonly used by other researchers in your field.

The best way to familiarize yourself with the kind of jargon used in your field is to read papers by other researchers and pay attention to their language.

Focused and well structured

An academic text is not just a collection of ideas about a topic—it needs to have a clear purpose. Start with a relevant research question or thesis statement , and use it to develop a focused argument. Only include information that is relevant to your overall purpose.

A coherent structure is crucial to organize your ideas. Pay attention to structure at three levels: the structure of the whole text, paragraph structure, and sentence structure.

Well sourced

Academic writing uses sources to support its claims. Sources are other texts (or media objects like photographs or films) that the author analyzes or uses as evidence. Many of your sources will be written by other academics; academic writing is collaborative and builds on previous research.

It’s important to consider which sources are credible and appropriate to use in academic writing. For example, citing Wikipedia is typically discouraged. Don’t rely on websites for information; instead, use academic databases and your university library to find credible sources.

You must always cite your sources in academic writing. This means acknowledging whenever you quote or paraphrase someone else’s work by including a citation in the text and a reference list at the end.

There are many different citation styles with different rules. The most common styles are APA , MLA , and Chicago . Make sure to consistently follow whatever style your institution requires. If you don’t cite correctly, you may get in trouble for plagiarism . A good plagiarism checker can help you catch any issues before it’s too late.

You can easily create accurate citations in APA or MLA style using our Citation Generators.

APA Citation Generator MLA Citation Generator

Correct and consistent

As well as following the rules of grammar, punctuation, and citation, it’s important to consistently apply stylistic conventions regarding:

• How to write numbers
• Introducing abbreviations
• Using verb tenses in different sections
• Capitalization of terms and headings
• Spelling and punctuation differences between UK and US English

In some cases there are several acceptable approaches that you can choose between—the most important thing is to apply the same rules consistently and to carefully proofread your text before you submit. If you don’t feel confident in your own proofreading abilities, you can get help from Scribbr’s professional proofreading services or Grammar Checker .

Academic writing generally tries to avoid being too personal. Information about the author may come in at some points—for example in the acknowledgements or in a personal reflection—but for the most part the text should focus on the research itself.

Always avoid addressing the reader directly with the second-person pronoun “you.” Use the impersonal pronoun “one” or an alternate phrasing instead for generalizations:

• As a teacher, you must treat your students fairly.
• As a teacher, one must treat one’s students fairly.
• Teachers must treat their students fairly.

The use of the first-person pronoun “I” used to be similarly discouraged in academic writing, but it is increasingly accepted in many fields. If you’re unsure whether to use the first person, pay attention to conventions in your field or ask your instructor.

When you refer to yourself, it should be for good reason. You can position yourself and describe what you did during the research, but avoid arbitrarily inserting your personal thoughts and feelings:

• In my opinion…
• I think that…
• I like/dislike…
• I conducted interviews with…
• I argue that…
• I hope to achieve…

Long-winded

Many students think their writing isn’t academic unless it’s over-complicated and long-winded. This isn’t a good approach—instead, aim to be as concise and direct as possible.

If a term can be cut or replaced with a more straightforward one without affecting your meaning, it should be. Avoid redundant phrasings in your text, and try replacing phrasal verbs with their one-word equivalents where possible:

• Interest in this phenomenon carried on in the year 2018 .
• Interest in this phenomenon continued in 2018 .

Repetition is a part of academic writing—for example, summarizing earlier information in the conclusion—but it’s important to avoid unnecessary repetition. Make sure that none of your sentences are repeating a point you’ve already made in different words.

Emotive and grandiose

An academic text is not the same thing as a literary, journalistic, or marketing text. Though you’re still trying to be persuasive, a lot of techniques from these styles are not appropriate in an academic context. Specifically, you should avoid appeals to emotion and inflated claims.

Though you may be writing about a topic that’s sensitive or important to you, the point of academic writing is to clearly communicate ideas, information, and arguments, not to inspire an emotional response. Avoid using emotive or subjective language :

• This horrible tragedy was obviously one of the worst catastrophes in construction history.
• The injury and mortality rates of this accident were among the highest in construction history.

Students are sometimes tempted to make the case for their topic with exaggerated , unsupported claims and flowery language. Stick to specific, grounded arguments that you can support with evidence, and don’t overstate your point:

• Charles Dickens is the greatest writer of the Victorian period, and his influence on all subsequent literature is enormous.
• Charles Dickens is one of the best-known writers of the Victorian period and has had a significant influence on the development of the English novel.

There are a a lot of writing tools that will make your writing process faster and easier. We’ll highlight three of them below.

Paraphrasing tool

AI writing tools like ChatGPT and a paraphrasing tool can help you rewrite text so that your ideas are clearer, you don’t repeat yourself, and your writing has a consistent tone.

They can also help you write more clearly about sources without having to quote them directly. Be warned, though: it’s still crucial to give credit to all sources in the right way to prevent plagiarism .

Grammar checker

Writing tools that scan your text for punctuation, spelling, and grammar mistakes. When it detects a mistake the grammar checke r will give instant feedback and suggest corrections. Helping you write clearly and avoid common mistakes .

You can use a summarizer if you want to condense text into its most important and useful ideas. With a summarizer tool, you can make it easier to understand complicated sources. You can also use the tool to make your research question clearer and summarize your main argument.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Use the checklist below to assess whether you have followed the rules of effective academic writing.

• Checklist: Academic writing

I avoid informal terms and contractions .

I avoid second-person pronouns (“you”).

I avoid emotive or exaggerated language.

I avoid redundant words and phrases.

I avoid unnecessary jargon and define terms where needed.

I present information as precisely and accurately as possible.

I use appropriate transitions to show the connections between my ideas.

My text is logically organized using paragraphs .

Each paragraph is focused on a single idea, expressed in a clear topic sentence .

Every part of the text relates to my central thesis or research question .

I support my claims with evidence.

I use the appropriate verb tenses in each section.

I consistently use either UK or US English .

I format numbers consistently.

I cite my sources using a consistent citation style .

Your text follows the most important rules of academic style. Make sure it's perfect with the help of a Scribbr editor!

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked.

• Taboo words in academic writing
• How to write more concisely
• Transition Words & Phrases | List & Examples

More interesting articles

• A step-by-step guide to the writing process
• Active vs. Passive Constructions | When to Use the Passive Voice
• Avoid informal writing
• Avoid rhetorical questions
• Be conscious of your adverb placement
• Capitalization in titles and headings
• Exclamation points (!)
• First-Person Pronouns | List, Examples & Explanation
• Forging good titles in academic writing
• Free, Downloadable Educational Templates for Students
• Free, Downloadable Lecture Slides for Educators and Students
• How to avoid repetition and redundancy
• How to write a lab report
• How to write effective headings
• Language mistakes in quotes
• List of 47 Phrasal Verbs and Their One-Word Substitutions
• Myth: It’s incorrect to start a sentence with “because”
• Myth: It’s an error to split infinitives
• Myth: It’s incorrect to start a sentence with a coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, for, nor, yet, so)
• Myth: Paragraph transitions should be placed at the ends of paragraphs
• Tense tendencies in academic texts
• Using abbreviations and acronyms
• What Is Anthropomorphism? | Definition & Examples
• What Is Sentence Case? | Explanation & Examples
• What Is Title Case? | Explanation & Worksheet
• Writing myths: The reasons we get bad advice
• Writing numbers: words and numerals

Get unlimited documents corrected

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts